Antigua and Barbuda

Light Rain with Thunder
77°F
High: 83°F
Low: 78°F
 

LOW EARTH ORBIT – The War of the Words

 War of the WordsThe war of words is well and truly on within the Antigua Labour Party, the house that VC Bird built. My array of multiple retractable broadband antennae can pick up the racket from all the way up here in low Earth orbit, the roar of the bacchanal crackling faintly through the static emanating from the Bird family broadcast facility.

From what Yours Truly can gather, the whole brouhaha is about the proper use of two little words. Nowadays it seems that the entire future of the ALP is bound up in the choice of which of these two little words shall decorate the party’s battle standard going into the 2014 general elections. Supporters of the contending factions demonstrate their loyalties by applying one or the other (code) word as a “modifier” to yet another commonly abused word: “labour”.

The louder faction, naturally, is the one that has access to its own radio station. Let no one tell you that the Bird political family has not learned to fully appreciate the power of the broadcast media in today’s Antigua & Barbuda. Anyone tuning in to “Liberty Radio” would be forgiven for forming the impression that the ALP is caught up in a tornado of discord and about to be ripped asunder unless the group travelling under the banner of “True” Labour prevails in its quest to save the legacy of the Father of the Nation from destruction by a usurper.



From that starting point, it is easy to deduce that the other of the contending factions must represent those ALP supporters who rally behind the elected leader of the parliamentary opposition Gaston Browne – who flies the flag of “New” Labour. Browne now faces the critical task of successfully piloting the ALP toward an achievable victory at the polls in 2014.

The spectacle would be ludicrous, if it were not so quintessentially Antigua & Barbuda. The whole affair has comic opera dynastic overtones, vaguely reminiscent of the “Wars of the Roses” – the long struggle between the houses of Lancaster and York that more-or-less ended in 1485 on Bosworth Field, with the death of King Richard III and the ascendancy of Henry Tudor as Henry VII of England.

It gets worse. In contemplating the issues over which the “War of the Words” is being fought, the famous satirical novel “Gulliver’s Travels” comes to mind – with particular reference to the issues over which the Lilliputians were waging war against the people of neighbouring Blefuscu. Would you believe these idle people were fighting over which end of a soft-boiled egg to crack in order to eat it?

When seen from this perspective, all the flying feathers and the clouds of dust being kicked up by the great debate over whether “True” or “New” Labour will best protect and extend the legacy of “Papa” Bird become completely laughable. The one good thing about all the clever sloganeering is that at least the words rhyme and create a nice rhythm when matched up with “Labour”.

The reality, of course, is that the whole affair is basically only a distracting sideshow. The worrisome aspect to the Bird radio media storm is that it threatens to diminish the ALP’s chances of attracting support from “The 40%” – that group of uncommitted voters who will make the difference between victory and defeat in 2014.

Here we come up against the sheer self-destructive absurdity of politics in this strange land of Antigua & Barbuda, where political parties can be depended upon to behave in a manner as inimical as possible to their own best interests, and the best interests of their supporters – not to mention the best interests of the nation as a whole.

It would be a matter of some real concern if the activities of the tiny movement called “True” Labour actually represented any significant force within the ALP. For proof of “True” Labour’s perceived lack of significance, consider the offhand manner in which Gaston Browne has disposed of the application by Vere Bird III to (essentially) dump Eustace “Teco” Lake and return the constituency of St John’s Rural South to its rightful owners. Vere Bird III’s application process is already all over before it has even begun? Has it been “deep-sixed” by an unimpressed ALP executive?

And all this has happened with nary a ripple on the surface of the “New” Antigua Labour Party, now clearly under “New” management.

Open and unscientific opinion polls currently featuring in the local media, one of the young Birds does appear to lack support. If the legacy of the Father of the Nation is in the hands of “True” Labour, then, in my opinion, the memory of VC Bird is in grave jeopardy. Michael Freeland, scion of ALP legend Sir Adolphus Freeland, has seemingly attracted far more personal popular support.

The very action of “pursuing” a media campaign against an elected party leader, intrinsically threatens the cohesion and the immediate prospects for the ALP going into imminent general elections. Again it gets worse, as the picture emerges of a totally self-interested movement bent on pursuing its own interests at the expense of the larger entity of which it forms a part (Big-enders versus Little-enders!).

The question now emerges as to which faction, in truth and in fact, represents the best option for protecting and extending the much-disputed legacy of VC Bird. Rational observers would tend to believe that the best way to protect and extend the legacy of the Father of the Nation would be to propel the political party he led to victory at the polls in 2014.



Apparently, two of Papa Bird’s many worshipful descendants Vere Bird III and Sean Bird see things differently; but then, perhaps two of Papa Bird’s worshipful descendants are not being particularly rational. Perhaps, caught up in being scions of a powerful political family, these starry-eyed young men have forgotten that their illustrious forebearer was not alone in building the Antigua Trades & Labour Union and the Antigua Labour Party.

Perhaps they are blind to the truth that whatever the history may have been, the ALP is now bigger than any one name or any one family. If such is the case, the showing of the relatively unknown Michael Freeland should serve as an eye-opener as to how much the rules have changed.

Hits: 1443

5 Comments In This Article   

HEADER   

RE: LOW EARTH ORBIT – The War of the Words

#5 concern citizen » 2013-02-06 19:41

Alot of the stalwarts of the party are not supporting Gaston publicly. They are giving the impression that they are supporting Gaston privately. That is not good enough. Their voices must be heard. They should come out publicly and say who they are supporting. Are they supporting the Birds or Gaston? In the event they are supporting Gaston they should publicly denounce the Birds action of division. The senior members of the party ought to let the Birds know that their actions are destructive. The Molwyn, Yearwood, Marshall, Humphreys, Percival and the other senior members must lend their voices to this problem. Now is the time not later. Their silence is letting the Birds know that they are in agreement with their destructive intent. Gaston need surrogates. Gaston should not be the one pushing back against the Birds vicious attacks against him and the party. Why are so many ALP intellectuals silent on this matter? Are they scared or are thay cowards? i hope it is not the latter. ALP if you keep this up, UPP will remain in power. The problem here is not Gaston. The problem is the Birds trying to hold on to power.
2
3
+
−

concern citizen

@ Jeb

#4 The Fly » 2013-02-06 15:34

You can't be serious? Gaston Browne has repeated the need for an inquiry into the fences and the WPP. As recent as last Tuesday on Insight, I heard him say that. I tell you what, come to North Street tomorrow night to hear for yourself!
0
3
+
−

The Fly

leadership?

#3 jeb » 2013-02-06 14:32

IMO the issue isn’t about "Bird". I am part of the 40% and am upset with the maligning and purported heavy bribing that it took for GB to win. I am of the belief that the 40% are totally fed up with anything that hints corruption. Personal interaction (admittedly limited) with GB since SAB days showed an arrogant, couldn’t care less person with a serious lack of decorum. I have a problem with GB’s associates, (Asot, Baldwin etc.) and irrational outbursts. By far the biggest problem for me is his lack of interest and/or taking a stand on the glaringly obvious thefts that have taken place in 9 years. I have listened to Insight and am yet to learn beyond 500 houses in 500 days (not impressed) what exactly his policies are. IMO the 40% want to see the 9 years of corruption prosecuted and particularly the WPP…the silence on that one is deafening. If one sits back and takes a serious look at WHO in the ALP has actually taken serious stands on issues effecting the public/country, GB is conspicuous by his ‘whispers’ or total absence. Leadership should not be a case of ‘look me, I reach’; leadership should be in the hands of someone who possesses all the right capabilities to lead.
5
1
+
−

jeb

the whole picture

#2 tenman » 2013-02-06 09:38

Quote:
He who rejects change is the architect of decay. The only human institution which rejects progress is the cemetery. Harold Wilson
Colin the strategy of trying to widen the party's appeal, is what will enable a 2013 or 2014 election victory. Listening to the other faction (old), their message is that the party has moved too far from its core principles. Its hard for me as an outsider to understand what they mean but I do know that anything that's stagnant will die. I hear the old labor party, more focused on the parties successes yet unwilling to learn from the important lessons of its failures. This to me, is no different from the current government. The negatives they both argue are only propaganda from their opponents. I disagree with some of the language coming from the "new" ALP because (real) history should be respected, but I agree that the blind worship needs to stop

..
1
1
+
−

tenman

RE: LOW EARTH ORBIT – The War of the Words

#1 Firebug » 2013-02-06 09:36

Such is the malaise of the high-born. consumed with a sense of entitlement, they are oblivious to the reality of the society around them, and the concerns and interest of those over whom they wish to rule. Power by whatever means necessary.
8
2
+
−

Firebug

Add comment

Mr. Colin Sampson

 Mr. Colin Sampson is a Journalist and the host of "The Colin Sampson Show" on Caribarena TV 

 

 

Follow us on Facebook

Spotlight on Education

Previous Next
Zone III Math Quiz Competition 2013
Antigua St. John's - Zone III schools is once again hosting its grade level math...  Read more

Latest Opinions by Colin Sampson

Search Directory


App

Android LogoDownload Caribarena's Android App Click To Download

Find us on Twitter!