That mankind was created with fundamental human rights, including the right to rule ourselves and not be ruled by others (freedom), is a matter of natural law.
A corollary is that individuals are also free to bind together in society and consent to be governed by representatives; but that creates majorities (government) and minorities (opposition). In that light, what right does the majority have to bind the minority, if “consent” is the touchstone of legitimate government? Theories of “social contract” or “tacit consent” fall short as valid explanations, because they would make even dictatorial rule legitimate.
According to the "state of nature” theory, the legitimacy of a government with rights and powers must not be assumed; its existence and legitimacy must be justified in a democratic, civil society.
Undeniably, whatever rights and powers a government possesses must be derived from the freely given consent of the people. But, it stands to reason that individuals cannot give to government rights they do not possess. Since individuals do not have the right to tax fellow citizens, where does the government derive its legitimate authority (right) to levy taxes on the incomes earned and properties acquired by residents of the state of Antigua & Barbuda?
I was informed that Section (b) of the preamble of the Constitution states that the people of Antigua & Barbuda “… believe that the operation of their economic system should result in the material resources of their community … serve the common good, that there should be adequate means of livelihood for all …”
While Section 46 of the said supreme law gives the Parliament the right to “make laws for the peace order and good government of Antigua and Barbuda," assuming arguendo that the government has the right to forcefully take our money in the form of taxes, is there any limit to how much of our hard earned money the government can take in taxes? I suspect that the short answer is NO. Theoretically, the government can take more than half of the earnings from our labour in taxes.
That being the case, can the citizens in a democracy like the state of Antigua & Barbuda, lawfully, or rightfully (righteously) refuse to pay taxes as a legitimate form of political protest?
|
|
Download Caribarena's Android App
Click To Download
12 Comments In This Article
@FNSRP
ANTIGUAN
re: disgusted - part 2
Please keep in mind that the government is under the supervision of the IMF. Desperate times call for desperate measures. Therefore, the government will do whatever is necessary to collect its money.
fnpsr
re: disgusted - part 1
One of the ways and probably the most effective way to bring about change is to hold your representative accountable. If your representative is holding meetings, you have to attend and ask the tough questions. If you want low taxes you have to find a candidate that believes in lower taxes. Unfortunately, the cat is already out of the bag, and you may have to wait until the next election. You cannot keep sending the same people back into office and expect them to do something different.
fnpsr
Fnspr
Disgusted
Tenman & fnpsr
Morris
Spot On
The people are justified to be outraged at the 'tax and squander' policies of this government. Especially since we have crumbling infratructure, a couple of white elephants being taken back by nature, the country is broke, broke, broke and can't even make payroll. And our national debt has increased whilst I and many others are out of work.
They don't get it, but your words may help.
Buzzbomb
Paper trail of our money
Dig It
revamp the tax system - par 2
Tenm an, I agree with your post!!
"Let’s fix the little things before we attempt to work on the big things”
fnpsr
revamp the tax system
fnpsr
Antiguan
Skye Williams
yep
..
tenman
RSS