- Details
-
Politics
-
Thursday, 14 March 2013 02:30
-
By Everton Barnes
Antigua St. John's - Acting Minority Leader in the Senate Arthur Nibbs is accusing the United Progressive Party government of using “legal gymnastics” to return the Citizenship by Investment Programme to the Upper House, one month after it was rejected by a majority of the senators.
Senator Nibbs’ comments came after it was clarified that the meeting of the Senate after a motion adopted on Monday by the House of Representative on the CIP will appear before the Senate, will now take place next week.
The opposition senator is taking strong objection to the return of the CIP bill to the Upper House without any changes by the House of Representatives, and also in a manner that in his view is a clear violation of the rules of parliament.
“This is nothing less than legal gymnastics, the manner in which the government is returning the CIP to Parliament,” he said. “The attorney general stated that he was not returning the bill, but a motion. My question is; what is the motion about? The CIP Bill.”
He explained that the passage of the motion (in the House of Representatives) and its transmission to the Upper House for the senators ‘to reconsider their position on the bill’ is tantamount to returning the bill to the Senate a second time after it has been rejected by the Senate. “This clearly violates the Standing Order of the Parliament,” Nibbs said.
“Rather than make changes to the CIP bill to make it more palatable to the senators, the government is making changes to the composition of the senate,” Nibbs observed.
He also had strong words for those named to replace the two errant senators – Colin Derrick and Anthony Stuart – who were fired by the prime minister for voting against the bill.
“In my considered opinion, whoever is named to fill the vacancies created by the departure of Stuart and Derrick will be called upon to compromise their own integrity, as they are expected to vote in a particular way irrespective of what their own consciences may say. Failure to ‘do as you are told’ could earn them the same fate as the senators they replace,” he contended.
The meeting of the Senate that was first announced to take place on Thursday will now likely take place on Tuesday.
10 Comments In This Article
RE: Govt Using Legal Gymnastics
croxley
Facts
RD Campos
@ Professor & Beanie Man - Risk Management!
Professor, That it would take the experience and wisdom of Dame Bridgette Harris to see through and predict the path of least resistance which GoAB would follow to pass the Bill speaks volumes of the Young Minds in the New ALP as the UPP have them chasing their tails. This commenter has noted the wiles and strategems of Shaka, Chaku, Juno A-BEC, Commisioner 81st, Mamba & Lady MacBeth. As old people say, who no hear will feel.
Beanie Man, you are doing exactly what is needed. Using your cognitive skills and education to research and understand not only the Caribbean Political, Economic, Social and Technological (PEST) Environment, but how the World is viewing and will be reacting to moves that did not consider or give full thought to Risk Management and the shocks which fragile econmise such as A&B's can withstand.
This commenter will remind that to be forewarned is to be forearmed.
Go Well! Much Respect!
John French II
Residence by Investment won't work either
Taff
Just what we need - more bad publicity for Antigua
www.trust.org/trustlaw/news/countries-with-a-cash-flow-problem-market-citizenship/
http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/columns/Risky--citizenship--sale-and-end-of-Bird-political-era-in-Antigua_13125627
www.mondaq.com/x/207422/wealth+management/The+Inconvenient+Truth
Of course, you won't read this bad news on www.antiguacitizenship.com, which appears to be an official mouthpiece on CIP. Strange that the 'How it works' page says 'Under Construction'
Beanie Man
@ Miego Man
Professor
RE: Govt Using Legal Gymnastics
http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/cis/cis_1118.html
Who going invest or buy passport after this indictment?
Port Man
@ Professor
If that were allowed, then any contrversal Bill could be entered into the Lower House as a "motion"!
I fail to see how these guys can abuse the system which they are sworn to uphold! We the people should have the balls enough to stand up against this type of behavior! This couldn't happen in my Middle East!
Miego Man
If it's good kill it
JP Farnsworth
GASTON'S ECHO ... SAY AFTER ME
Will some legal beagle please explain to me what is illegal about MOVING and PASSAGE of a MOTION in the Lower House and sending it to the Senate for the same treatment? MOTIONS have recently become illegal in the Houses of Parliament? Or is it that you cannot PASS a MOTION regarding a BILL that has been rejected by the Senate?
It is the job of clever lawyers to perform Legal Gymnastics and find end runs arround any law. Saying that it is wrong for UPP lawyers to do what lawyers do to find ways to benefit their client is ludicrous.
The Disgraced Senators closed the front door to CIP, but left the back door open and we all know that them UPP guys love the BACK DOOR.
Professor
RSS