- Details
-
Politics
-
Saturday, 09 June 2012 02:30
-
By press release
Antigua St John’s – We reproduce in full a statement made by Opposition Leader Hon. Lester Bird on Friday, as he addressed remarks made by Attorney General Hon. Justin Simon pertaining to the Motion of No-Confidence.
Introduction
On Monday16, April, 2012, the Steering Committee of the Antigua and Barbuda Labour Party (ALP) made a decision, at my prompting, to submit to the Parliament through the Speaker, a Resolution of No-Confidence in Prime Minister Baldwin Spencer. On the Friday following, April 20, 2012, at the official ALP Executive Committee Meeting, the decision was ratified.
On April 23, 2012, a copy of the Resolution and a letter signed by me were dispatched to the Speaker. At the very next official meeting of the Executive, ALP parliamentarians agreed to present and debate sections of the Resolution covering various issues in the Resolution.
At that time, the date for the presentation of the Resolution in Parliament was not known. When the Notice for the Wednesday May 30, 2012, parliamentary sitting was made known to the ALP parliamentarians on Thursday May 24, 2012, the ALP held an Open Forum on Friday, May 25, 2012, to affirm their readiness to address the Resolution in parliament. Only one ALP parliamentarian was absent, because he was off-island.
I relate these dates and events in order to demonstrate the kind of pre-planning and the complex processes that occupied our thinking in the six weeks preceding Wednesday, May 30, 2012the day on which the parliamentary debate was set to take place. No one contemplated delaying the Motion, or withdrawing the Motion of No-Confidence, up until that Friday, May 25, 2012.
Changed Circumstance When my lawyer reminded me on Sunday, May 27, 2012, that I was scheduled to appear before the Chief Magistrate, along with City South Representatives Gaston Browne and Asot Michael on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday, May 29,30, and 31, 2012, to answer to Public Order charges dating back to March 2011, I instructed my assistant to prepare a letter, addressed to the Speaker. The Sunday, May 27, 2012, letter sought to have the date for discussion of the Resolution moved to Thursday, June 7, 2012. I further instructed my assistant to deliver the letter to the Speaker that Sunday at the Moravian Church where the Speaker was scheduled to be present. The Speaker was not seen at the service, and the Monday was Whit Monday, a holiday.
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012, following three hours of testimony by one witness, the Chief Magistrate postponed the (two other days of) scheduled hearings until August 27 and 28, 2012. At that point, there was no need for any delay in the presentation of the Motion of No-Confidence on Wednesday afternoon.
My Attendance at the Parliament I dutifully attended the morning sitting of the Parliament on Wednesday, May 30, 2012. I arrived at the Parliament at 9:15 am, took my seat and never once moved from my seat until 3:15 pm when the morning session ended. When it became evident to me that my energy levels began to wane, I asked the Member of Parliament from St. Peter’s to raise the issue of postponement with the Speaker.
All those present could see the consultations between both officials which were taking place while the sitting continued. I never instructed the Representative to speak with the Attorney General about anything. Under the Standing Orders, the Speaker has enormous adjudicative powers and I wished to rely upon the fairness and equity which the Speaker has publicly declared that she demonstrates to both sides of the aisle.
The discussion with the Attorney General, I later learned, was proposed by the Speaker. That discussion flowed from “postponement” to “withdrawal”, but those were not my instructions to the Representative in his discussions with the Speaker. The Attorney General has not claimed that I spoke with him; neither has he claimed that the Representative broached the subject of “withdrawal of the motion” on my behalf. I never asked anyone to enter into discussions with the Attorney General.
At any rate, it strikes me as rather odd that it took an entire week, following the May 30, 2012, discussions between the Representative and the Attorney General, for Antigua and Barbuda to learn that the issue of “withdrawal” was raised with him by the St. Peter’s Representative. I have noted that the Newspaper and the Big Stories of today, Friday, June 8, 2012, have given prominence to the Attorney General and his claims.
I repeat once more that had I not felt unwell, I would have returned after lunch to present the Motion of No-Confidence and to debate it for an additional six hours or more. Every Parliamentarian is entitled under the Standing Orders (or rules of Parliament) to speak for one hour; the debate could have lasted until mid-day of the following day had it started at 6:00 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012.
Conclusion I will again submit a request for a new date for the Motion of No-Confidence in the Prime Minister. I will request— as I did in my May 27, 2012, letter to the Speaker— that a specific day and a specific starting time be set aside for the debate. It is patently unfair to the Antigua and Barbuda people, who are extremely interested in this very important debate, for them to be required to forego their night’s rest, when the Parliamentary sitting can be so scheduled as to allow for a reasonable starting time.
As the nation continues to pay attention to the issues that confront us, it is my hope that they will let their UPP Representatives know that the Parliament is the place for a discussion of this nature and that excuses and maneuverings to avoid its discussion are not acceptable.
May God continue to shield us from harm and danger in these perilous and parlous times. I thank you for listening.
19 Comments In This Article
RE: Bird Responds To Simon’s Revelations
Audrey Taylor
We want results and not excuses!
Quote: Agreed with MP Bird on that!
Dig It
Emb**ment
The point is not neccesarily to get amass the votes taking down the PM. It is to put a big hole into the UPP's mantra's of Integrity in Government and to show the scope of Corruption that has cast dark shadow over that poor governance!
UncommonSense
RE: Bird Responds To Simon’s Revelations
Audrey Taylor
Bigger Picture
Anu
re: morris
Based upon the above, it would seem to me that the UPP is in the “cat bird’s seat”. Therefore, if they are confident that the motion will fail, they should schedule a debate, as previously suggested, or some facsimile of it and get the matter resolved one way or the other. But, the debate has to be deemed as fair!!
If the UPP is not inclined to schedule a debate on the issue in the near future, they are playing the same game as MP Bird. They are in control of the agenda and will play MP Bird and the ALP like a fiddle.
Right now it is all about “parliamentary gamesmanship” and the ALP is not in a position to dictate to the UPP.
“Let’s fix the little things before we attempt to fix the big things.”
fnpsr
@ fnpsr
Morris
all is not lost - part 2 & final
To make this fight fair for all concerned, I suggest that the Speaker scheduled a date, 10 days in advance, with nothing else on the agenda, to commence promptly at 8:00 a.m. with one hour lunch at noon, to resume promptly at 1:00 p.m. This would give ample time for a full discussion and vote and let the chips fall where they may.
“Let’s fix the little things before we attempt to fix the big things.”
fnpsr
all is not lost - part 1
Furthermore, could it also be possible that MP Bird did not have the votes to carry the motion and therefore it would have failed? So instead of having the motion failed, MP Bird unwittingly used his illness to postpone. MP Bird knows that this postponement will give him more time to garner the votes that he needs.
fnpsr
RE: Bird Responds To Simon’s Revelations
* When did his attorney find out about the scheduled court appearance? I am sure the judge didn't call him that same Sunday morning to inform him of LB's court appearance.
* The Green Bay Moravian Church starts its morning service at 0900 on Sundays, so what time did he get the call from his lawyer and what time did he instruct his assistant to write and deliver this letter?
* Was any attempt made by LB or his assistant on that Monday to contact the speaker? I am sure she was on island on that day; however, even if she went to the beach it is probably safe to say that she made it home at some point afterwards.
MP Bird, your attempt at demonstrating the " kind of pre-planning and complexity of the process" has fallen way short of the target. It really doesn't make much sense for you to pursue another date, since your credibility is now in question by the people.
Morris
RE: Bird Responds To Simon’s Revelations
Lester I appeal to you to call it a day and allow the party to select a new leader and move forward. There is nothing new you have to offer the nation at age 76 and in ill health. If you fail to move, all the comrades should demand that you move off the scenes. Lester, be a statesman and leave. Is this retribution why you are kept there to suffer for your past sins ? Give it up and become a senior statesman for your country.
J Bird
Its all about xxxt!
This guy has caused Labor to loss the 04.. and 09 elections and will cause the loss in 2014...!!!
Balwin and Shoul will get another 5 year to stave the people into submission and Force the Nation to accept xxxt as the Next PM!!!!!!
Poor ,Gaston/Robin/M olwyn ;you guys are been used to pave the way for King xxxt!!!
D. Merchant
A TANGLED WEB OF DECEPTION
Yet, he was not in court, but in parliament, Lester can sell that hogwash to his gullible supporters. His statement is a futile attempt to deflect blame. Why not take responsibility for your failure? Remember, you were unaware of the Standing Order delegating another MP to move the motion. Indeed a tangled web of deception, nuff said!
THE GODFATHER
RE: Bird Responds To Simon’s Revelations
pedro
RE: Bird Responds To Simon’s Revelations
He does make a good point though….Why did it take a week for the Attorney General and the Speaker to come out, almost in concert, to declare publicly that Mr. Bird had approached them (via his surrogate) to seek to withdraw the motion? I would take their claims with a grain of salt, since it is glaringly evident where their self-interests lie.
Antiguan Abroad
RE: Bird Responds To Simon’s Revelations
Cool Ruler
OBSERVER # 2
STEVE
OBSERVER # 1
STEVE
HOG-WASH EXPLANATIONS
What was so complex about the process? Who was the missing parliamentarian ?
Clearly, it was not Teko Lake, Cutie Benjamin, Molwyn Joseph, Robin Yearwood, Gaston Browne and certainly not you. Do not play the game of the missing cookie from the jar. Why your convenient and deceptive omission?
You are guilty of collusion, deception and weak leadership. Your health, well that is a different matter. However, you should be more concerned about that. Any other motion is to quit and allow for a smooth transition of Opposition leadership.
CLASSICUS
RSS