Antigua and Barbuda

Partly Cloudy
79°F
High: 83°F
Low: 77°F
 

Bird Responds To Simon’s Revelations

Opposition leader Lester BirdAntigua St John’s – We reproduce in full a statement made by Opposition Leader Hon. Lester Bird on Friday, as he addressed remarks made by Attorney General Hon. Justin Simon pertaining to the Motion of No-Confidence.

Introduction
 
On Monday16, April, 2012, the Steering Committee of the Antigua and Barbuda Labour Party (ALP) made a decision, at my prompting, to submit to the Parliament through the Speaker, a Resolution of No-Confidence in Prime Minister Baldwin Spencer. On the Friday following, April 20, 2012, at the official ALP Executive Committee Meeting, the decision was ratified.
 



On April 23, 2012, a copy of the Resolution and a letter signed by me were dispatched to the Speaker. At the very next official meeting of the Executive, ALP parliamentarians agreed to present and debate sections of the Resolution covering various issues in the Resolution.

At that time, the date for the presentation of the Resolution in Parliament was not known. When the Notice for the Wednesday May 30, 2012, parliamentary sitting was made known to the ALP parliamentarians on Thursday May 24, 2012, the ALP held an Open Forum on Friday, May 25, 2012, to affirm their readiness to address the Resolution in parliament. Only one ALP parliamentarian was absent, because he was off-island.
 
I relate these dates and events in order to demonstrate the kind of pre-planning and the complex processes that occupied our thinking in the six weeks preceding Wednesday, May 30, 2012the day on which the parliamentary debate was set to take place. No one contemplated delaying the Motion, or withdrawing the Motion of No-Confidence, up until that Friday, May 25, 2012.
 
 
Changed Circumstance
 
When my lawyer reminded me on Sunday, May 27, 2012, that I was scheduled to appear before the Chief Magistrate, along with City South Representatives Gaston Browne and Asot Michael on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday, May 29,30, and 31, 2012, to answer to Public Order charges dating back to March 2011, I instructed my assistant to prepare a letter, addressed to the Speaker. The Sunday, May 27, 2012, letter sought to have the date for discussion of the Resolution moved to Thursday, June 7, 2012. I further instructed my assistant to deliver the letter to the Speaker that Sunday at the Moravian Church where the Speaker was scheduled to be present. The Speaker was not seen at the service, and the Monday was Whit Monday, a holiday.
 
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012, following three hours of testimony by one witness, the Chief Magistrate postponed the (two other days of) scheduled hearings until August 27 and 28, 2012. At that point, there was no need for any delay in the presentation of the Motion of No-Confidence on Wednesday afternoon.
 
 
My Attendance at the Parliament
 
I dutifully attended the morning sitting of the Parliament on Wednesday, May 30, 2012. I arrived at the Parliament at 9:15 am, took my seat and never once moved from my seat until 3:15 pm when the morning session ended. When it became evident to me that my energy levels began to wane, I asked the Member of Parliament from St. Peter’s to raise the issue of postponement with the Speaker.

All those present could see the consultations between both officials which were taking place while the sitting continued. I never instructed the Representative to speak with the Attorney General about anything. Under the Standing Orders, the Speaker has enormous adjudicative powers and I wished to rely upon the fairness and equity which the Speaker has publicly declared that she demonstrates to both sides of the aisle.
 
The discussion with the Attorney General, I later learned, was proposed by the Speaker. That discussion flowed from “postponement” to “withdrawal”, but those were not my instructions to the Representative in his discussions with the Speaker. The Attorney General has not claimed that I spoke with him; neither has he claimed that the Representative broached the subject of “withdrawal of the motion” on my behalf. I never asked anyone to enter into discussions with the Attorney General.
 
At any rate, it strikes me as rather odd that it took an entire week, following the May 30, 2012, discussions between the Representative and the Attorney General, for Antigua and Barbuda to learn that the issue of “withdrawal” was raised with him by the St. Peter’s Representative. I have noted that the Newspaper and the Big Stories of today, Friday, June 8, 2012, have given prominence to the Attorney General and his claims.
 


I repeat once more that had I not felt unwell, I would have returned after lunch to present the Motion of No-Confidence and to debate it for an additional six hours or more. Every Parliamentarian is entitled under the Standing Orders (or rules of Parliament) to speak for one hour; the debate could have lasted until mid-day of the following day had it started at 6:00 pm on Wednesday, May 30, 2012.
 
 
Conclusion
 
I will again submit a request for a new date for the Motion of No-Confidence in the Prime Minister. I will request— as I did in my May 27, 2012, letter to the Speaker— that a specific day and a specific starting time be set aside for the debate. It is patently unfair to the Antigua and Barbuda people, who are extremely interested in this very important debate, for them to be required to forego their night’s rest, when the Parliamentary sitting can be so scheduled as to allow for a reasonable starting time.
 
As the nation continues to pay attention to the issues that confront us, it is my hope that they will let their UPP Representatives know that the Parliament is the place for a discussion of this nature and that excuses and maneuverings to avoid its discussion are not acceptable.
 
May God continue to shield us from harm and danger in these perilous and parlous times. I thank you for listening.

Hits: 1386

19 Comments In This Article   

HEADER   

RE: Bird Responds To Simon’s Revelations

#19 Audrey Taylor » 2012-06-10 19:34

Justin like Jack is a dull boy .
0
0
+
−

Audrey Taylor

We want results and not excuses!

#18 Dig It » 2012-06-10 14:10

For those who remembered "Yes Mr. Minister," you will know thatQuote:
"Two kinds of government chair correspond with the two kinds of minister: one sort folds up instantly and the other sort goes round and round in circles."
It is time our politicians stop "selling-the-people-short," when acting in their interests! The fact of the matter is the people wants "results" and less "excuses!"
Quote:
As the nation continues to pay attention to the issues that confront us, it is my hope that they will let their UPP Representatives know that the Parliament is the place for a discussion of this nature and that excuses and maneuverings to avoid its discussion are not acceptable.
Agreed with MP Bird on that!
1
0
+
−

Dig It

Emb**ment

#17 UncommonSense » 2012-06-09 21:49

The NO COONFIDENCE DEBATE was not properly strategized by Bird. He should have put plan B & C in place. It's not enough to say that he was not feeling well. So what? Cater for that possibility as well given the fact that he is not a healthy or young man.

The point is not neccesarily to get amass the votes taking down the PM. It is to put a big hole into the UPP's mantra's of Integrity in Government and to show the scope of Corruption that has cast dark shadow over that poor governance!
2
1
+
−

UncommonSense

RE: Bird Responds To Simon’s Revelations

#16 Audrey Taylor » 2012-06-09 19:22

ALP needs to Dump the bad apples before they ruin the it's credibility
5
0
+
−

Audrey Taylor

Bigger Picture

#15 Anu » 2012-06-09 13:15

Apart from the vote of no confidence going through to obtain a result, the main reason for it to be tabled is for we the citerzens of Antigua and Barbuda to hear the arguments being put forward by both sides of the House of representative. Would it be fair for us the citerzens to stay up all night to hear the debates which is of great importance by our representatives , after a full day on the job and being parents to our children? It is rather unfortunate that the motion was not tabled, but I as a citerzen of my country would still like to hear the debate on this an important issue. Apart from who wins the vote, because we are well aware that the "I" will have it, but the debate from both side of the floor will give me a clearer view of what arguments are factual or flaud. Instead of taking shots at the Mp's and making all kinds of speculations on the matter, it is in our interest that we get another chance to hear the "MOTION OF NO CONFIDENCE" tabled, however i would much prefer for it to be a day session.
3
0
+
−

Anu

re: morris

#14 fnpsr » 2012-06-09 12:55

Morris, I thank you for joining the debate. I will concede that MP Bird may not have been honest with the people and that he may not have communicated effectively with his members. Additionally, I will concede that his credibility may have been shredded and he may still not have the votes to carry the motion. But the issue at hand is a debate on the “no confidence vote”.

Based upon the above, it would seem to me that the UPP is in the “cat bird’s seat”. Therefore, if they are confident that the motion will fail, they should schedule a debate, as previously suggested, or some facsimile of it and get the matter resolved one way or the other. But, the debate has to be deemed as fair!!

If the UPP is not inclined to schedule a debate on the issue in the near future, they are playing the same game as MP Bird. They are in control of the agenda and will play MP Bird and the ALP like a fiddle.

Right now it is all about “parliamentary gamesmanship” and the ALP is not in a position to dictate to the UPP.

“Let’s fix the little things before we attempt to fix the big things.”
2
2
+
−

fnpsr

@ fnpsr

#13 Morris » 2012-06-09 11:33

Your suggestion would probably work in a perfect situation, but we all know that that is not the case with ANU. The ALP leadership is not being honest with the people whose votes they so desperately need if they plan on regaining governance. The party leadership was not communicating effectively with their members, because they knew before hand that they did not have the votes. Therefore, instead of waiting at the last minute to then hinge the excuse on ill health, MP Bird should have consulted with his members and get their consent to seek a postponement days (at least a week) in advance to garner the support needed to succeed. Right now, his credibility is shredded.
9
2
+
−

Morris

all is not lost - part 2 & final

#12 fnpsr » 2012-06-09 10:45

Some have said that the motion failed. But how can it fail if it were never called, discussed and voted upon. So I say, that all is not lost and MP Bird will live to fight another day.

To make this fight fair for all concerned, I suggest that the Speaker scheduled a date, 10 days in advance, with nothing else on the agenda, to commence promptly at 8:00 a.m. with one hour lunch at noon, to resume promptly at 1:00 p.m. This would give ample time for a full discussion and vote and let the chips fall where they may.

“Let’s fix the little things before we attempt to fix the big things.”
3
4
+
−

fnpsr

all is not lost - part 1

#11 fnpsr » 2012-06-09 10:44

Honestly, I do not see what the big deal is all about. The “no confidence vote” was the last item scheduled on the Standing Order. Notwithstanding that MP Bird became sick, according to MP Bird, the discussion would have started somewhere around 6: 00 P.M and run well into the wee hours of the nest day. Give MP bird some credit! Don’t you think he realized this and used his illness to have the discussion delayed knowing that the good people of Antigua & Barbuda would be entitled to listen to the debate?

Furthermore, could it also be possible that MP Bird did not have the votes to carry the motion and therefore it would have failed? So instead of having the motion failed, MP Bird unwittingly used his illness to postpone. MP Bird knows that this postponement will give him more time to garner the votes that he needs.
4
4
+
−

fnpsr

RE: Bird Responds To Simon’s Revelations

#10 Morris » 2012-06-09 09:57

Ok, let me get this straight, his lawyer told him about a court appearance the Sunday prior to the motion of no confidence, then he instructs his assistant to write a letter and deliver it to the speaker that very day?

* When did his attorney find out about the scheduled court appearance? I am sure the judge didn't call him that same Sunday morning to inform him of LB's court appearance.
* The Green Bay Moravian Church starts its morning service at 0900 on Sundays, so what time did he get the call from his lawyer and what time did he instruct his assistant to write and deliver this letter?
* Was any attempt made by LB or his assistant on that Monday to contact the speaker? I am sure she was on island on that day; however, even if she went to the beach it is probably safe to say that she made it home at some point afterwards.

MP Bird, your attempt at demonstrating the " kind of pre-planning and complexity of the process" has fallen way short of the target. It really doesn't make much sense for you to pursue another date, since your credibility is now in question by the people.
7
2
+
−

Morris

RE: Bird Responds To Simon’s Revelations

#9 J Bird » 2012-06-09 09:51

Lester you need to take a rest and allow a leader to evolve. You know you cannot take the rigors of a campaign yet you continue to hold on to power for selfish reasons. You are the ALP's devil and you should not risk taking the party to defeat.

Lester I appeal to you to call it a day and allow the party to select a new leader and move forward. There is nothing new you have to offer the nation at age 76 and in ill health. If you fail to move, all the comrades should demand that you move off the scenes. Lester, be a statesman and leave. Is this retribution why you are kept there to suffer for your past sins ? Give it up and become a senior statesman for your country.
10
2
+
−

J Bird

Its all about xxxt!

#8 D. Merchant » 2012-06-09 09:29

lester's only reason in politicts is to protect xxxt.. All this foolishness about how he had to remove the motion against the wishess of his Party ,all rotates On xxxxts protestion...
This guy has caused Labor to loss the 04.. and 09 elections and will cause the loss in 2014...!!!
Balwin and Shoul will get another 5 year to stave the people into submission and Force the Nation to accept xxxt as the Next PM!!!!!!
Poor ,Gaston/Robin/M olwyn ;you guys are been used to pave the way for King xxxt!!! :sad: Where is Vere111???????? ?????
3
0
+
−

D. Merchant

A TANGLED WEB OF DECEPTION

#7 THE GODFATHER » 2012-06-09 08:41

The failed no confidence motion, preceded six weeks of meticulous planning, subsequently followed by dubious statement of lies. The statement of lies from Opposition Leader Lester Bird is pellucid, now the court is used as a cover to avoid further backlash an embar**ment.

Yet, he was not in court, but in parliament, Lester can sell that hogwash to his gullible supporters. His statement is a futile attempt to deflect blame. Why not take responsibility for your failure? Remember, you were unaware of the Standing Order delegating another MP to move the motion. Indeed a tangled web of deception, nuff said!
9
6
+
−

THE GODFATHER

RE: Bird Responds To Simon’s Revelations

#6 pedro » 2012-06-09 07:41

I hope we can now re-focus on the issues of the day and that the ALP leadership will be united in its effort to defeat the UPP in the next general elections. The pople are suffering and deserve a competent government. UPP must go!
6
7
+
−

pedro

RE: Bird Responds To Simon’s Revelations

#5 Antiguan Abroad » 2012-06-09 06:28

Are folks to be impressed that Mr. Bird "dutifully" sat in his chair in Parliament for six hours and never left his seat? In my humble opinion, if he did so, it was a rather foolish thing to do. One does not have to be a medical expert to realize the harmful impact of continuous sitting without "moving" (his words). Even young healthy people are advised to rise up and stretch their legs regularly to avoid “embolisms” or other conditions that might clog the arteries. Aside from this display of ignorance about leading a healthy lifestyle, Mr. Bird needs to come to grips with the fact that the world (or in this case, Parliament) cannot revolve around, or make special accommodations, for his health problems.

He does make a good point though….Why did it take a week for the Attorney General and the Speaker to come out, almost in concert, to declare publicly that Mr. Bird had approached them (via his surrogate) to seek to withdraw the motion? I would take their claims with a grain of salt, since it is glaringly evident where their self-interests lie.
8
4
+
−

Antiguan Abroad

RE: Bird Responds To Simon’s Revelations

#4 Cool Ruler » 2012-06-09 06:16

There is time to speak and a time to hush your mouth, Lester Bird you should have just kept quiet because your feeble statement just reminds the nation that there rigors of running a government may be too much for you at this time in your life.
14
2
+
−

Cool Ruler

OBSERVER # 2

#3 STEVE » 2012-06-09 05:33

The discussion with the Attorney General, I later learned, was proposed by the Speaker. That discussion flowed from “postponement” to “withdrawal”, but those were not my instructions to the Representative in his discussions with the Speaker. SO, IS THE PUBLIC TO UNDERSTAND THAT ASOT TOOK IT UPON HIMSELF TO “WITHDRAW THE MOTION”? IF THAT IS SO I GUESS ASOT HAVE LESS REGARD FOR THE LEADER (LOL) THAN GASTON, AS GASTON CLAIMS (LOL) THAT ONLY THE LEADER SHOULD PRESENT THE MOTION (GIVE ME AN ASPRIN). It is clear to me that leading persons in the A.L.P. are not being totally honest with their supporters or the public. It is sad because we need to get the rid of the U.P.P. but I certainly will not vote for “another exchange” come next elections. U.P.P. AND A.L.P. NEED TO GO.
11
2
+
−

STEVE

OBSERVER # 1

#2 STEVE » 2012-06-09 05:32

Lester Bird stated: “I dutifully attended the morning sitting of the Parliament on Wednesday, May 30, 2012. I arrived at the Parliament at 9:15 am, took my seat and never once moved from my seat until 3:15 pm when the morning session ended”. It is reported on Caribarena (Friday, 08 June 2012 02:30; by caribarena news) “the Opposition Leader reportedly left the sitting. This was before the closure of the first session that ended around 2:00pm”. WHO IS TELLING THE TRUTH?
8
1
+
−

STEVE

HOG-WASH EXPLANATIONS

#1 CLASSICUS » 2012-06-09 05:01

Who do you think you can fool. These explanations are nothing short of hog-wash, lies and deception.

What was so complex about the process? Who was the missing parliamentarian ?

Clearly, it was not Teko Lake, Cutie Benjamin, Molwyn Joseph, Robin Yearwood, Gaston Browne and certainly not you. Do not play the game of the missing cookie from the jar. Why your convenient and deceptive omission?

You are guilty of collusion, deception and weak leadership. Your health, well that is a different matter. However, you should be more concerned about that. Any other motion is to quit and allow for a smooth transition of Opposition leadership.
15
3
+
−

CLASSICUS

Add comment

World News

Follow us on Facebook

Spotlight on Business

Previous Next
Social Media Exposes Illegal Workers
Antigua St. John's - The saga of illegal workers at Il Giardino, the fine dining...  Read more

Latest Politics News

Search Directory


Directory Listings


Bounceabout Rentals

Bounce-about Rentals The original Bouncy Castle is Fun for all the Children, Birthday Parties and lots more.

Category: Outdoor


Belizaire Jason M.D.

Dr. Jason Belizaire M.D. Diplomate of the American Board of Internal Medicine  

Category: Doctors

App

Android LogoDownload Caribarena's Android App Click To Download

Find us on Twitter!