Antigua and Barbuda

Partly Cloudy
82°F
High: 82°F
Low: 77°F
 

Joseph Accuses Lovell of Deceit

Joseph Accuses Lovell of DeceitAntigua St John's - Member of Parliament for St. Mary’s North Molwyn Joseph has accused Minister of Finance Harold Lovell of lying to the nation.

Joseph was responding to Lovell’s explanation of the government’s right to borrow over US$52 million for the controversial Wadadli Power Plant and sub-station.

In tabling the loan agreement in parliament on Wednesday, Lovell said that it was important for government to inform the House that it was “very pleased” to be in a position to present the loan agreement.



The finance minister pointed out that contrary to what has been said in some circles, “we (government) are doing it as a matter of good governance.”

Joseph had accused Lovell and the government of breaching the rules governing the contracting of loans.

Lovell referred to the Antigua and Barbuda Development Loan Act of 2002 which, according to him, allows the finance ministry to borrow up to US$120M for the purpose of financing development projects in the country.

The minister indicated that the act has been used since its passage in 2002 by the previous administration, and accordingly the United Progressive Party (UPP) is relying on it as an Act of the House that remains in force.

He further highlighted a similar Act - The Antigua & Barbuda (Development Loan) Act 2002 - which he said was passed in 1986 and renewed in 2002 by the Antigua Labour Party (ALP).

The Antigua & Barbuda (Development Loan) Act No.7 of 2002 is defined as:

“An Act to authorize the Minister of Finance to borrow the sums of moneys not exceeding an aggregate sum of One Hundred and Twenty Million Dollars in United States Currency or of the equivalent in other currencies for the purpose of financing development projects in Antigua and Barbuda, debt service charges and matters incidental thereto.”

The Member of Parliament for St. Mary’s North however countered that Lovell is trying to confuse the issue. He believes that Lovell is deliberately attempting to mislead the people of Antigua & Barbuda.

“I have no problem with Lovell’s assertions that the government has the right to borrow monies,” he said.

“What Lovell is not telling the people is that he must get authority from parliament in order to borrow monies for all capital projects.

“In addition,” said Joseph, “the US$120 million is a limit that the government can borrow in any calendar year and not the amount needed to come to parliament.

“How can you have a country where a minister of finance would claim and accept that he has to come to parliament yearly (via the budget debate) to spend government revenue and at the same time he does not have to come to parliament for authorization to borrow unless its 322 million EC dollars (US120 million)?

“It’s absurd for Lovell to think that he could borrow all that money and never bring it before parliament.”



Joseph said that the Finance Administration Act 2006 (number 23 of 2006) passed by the government supports his (Joseph’s) claims.

Part VIII Public Debt and Guarantees states:

“47. No money shall be raised on the credit of the government except under the authority of an Act of Parliament or of a resolution of the House.”

The said act (Finance Administration Act 2006) further states:

“54. No guarantee of a financial liability shall be given by the government unless it is –

(a) given in accordance with the provisions of an Act authorizing the guarantee; or

(b) authorized by resolution of the House within ninety days.”

“We are four years after the fact,” said Joseph, “and it’s now that the government is bringing this agreement to parliament.
“This is a clear breach of the laws of Antigua & Barbuda.”

The MP went on to say that after reading the loan agreement he noted that the Exim Bank of China made sure there was a clause to protect its own interests.

He pointed to Article 5.2 of the loan agreement, which indicates:

“All authorizations acts and procedures necessary for the signing and performance of this agreement have been completed and are in full force and effect.”

Article 5.3 states:

“The borrower has completed all the acts and procedures as required by the laws of the borrower’s country in order for this agreement to constitute valid and legally binding obligation of the borrower in accordance with its terms including obtaining all the approvals and authorizations from relevant authorities of the borrower’s country and respecting all the registrations or filings as required by the laws of the borrower’s country and such approval, authorization, registration and filings are in full force and effect.”

“The (above) articles tell me that the Chinese protected themselves but this government did not do the same thing,” the MP alleges.

Lovell disagreed with Joseph’s characterization that the government acted illegally in acquiring the loan.

 “We are under no legal obligation (to present these documents),” Lovell said in parliament, “but we will accept that in the interest of transparency and accountability it (the documents) is here …

“This matter ought not to be controversial anymore.

“We are moving forward in the interest of transparency and good governance.”



Joseph countered: “That’s not true and he knows that.

“He (Lovell) is attempting to justify the government’s failure to bring to parliament over EC$1.5 billion of borrowing within their eight years in office.

“The loan from Venezuela of US fifty million dollars (EC$135 million) never came to parliament. This power plant loan - another US fifty-two million dollars (EC$139.4 million) - after about four years is just coming to parliament, and the US 47 million dollars (EC$126.9 million) for the airport terminal and another US 40 million dollars (EC$$108 million) for the airport runway never made it before parliament.”

Joseph concluded:

“Lovell knows that that could never be deemed as acceptable behavior by any government, and the people of Antigua & Barbuda must know the truth.

“The government needs to tell us how they spent the US$52 million for the power plant and all other monies borrowed: but so far they have not done that.”

Hits: 2681

11 Comments In This Article   

HEADER   

Eric - questions back at you

#11 tenman » 2012-06-06 23:18

Eric perhaps this is news to you, but the then and current solicitor general, Lebrecht Hesse, looked at the issue and gave a legal opinion that the then minister of finance did nothing illegal. If you doubt me take a read of that article I highlighted in the past, and Cool Ruler pointed to today by Douglas Payne. Let me ask you, wasn't Joseph in some way punished for this infraction when he was removed from finance for his handling of this matter? When will such happen, when UPP government ministers act in a questionable manner?
..
0
0
+
−

tenman

RE: Joseph Accuses Lovell of Deceit

#10 Eric » 2012-06-06 20:29

What ever happened to the Rolls Royce allegedly lifted over the customs fence during a public holiday? Was that legal?
0
0
+
−

Eric

RE: Joseph Accuses Lovell of Deceit

#9 Just Sayin » 2012-06-04 10:33

The BIG question is Lovell guilty of cxxxupxxn or incompetence... .maybe its BOTH!
0
0
+
−

Just Sayin

OVERSTANDING HE 47TH ACT OF 2002

#8 OUTOFANTIGUA » 2012-06-03 16:55

U S WHAT PART OF (EXCEPT UNDER THE AUTHORITY OFAN ACT OF PARLIAMENT) DONT U UNDERSTAND. KEY WORD HERE IS AUTHORITY OF THE PARLIAMENT
0
0
+
−

OUTOFANTIGUA

US - common sense

#7 tenman » 2012-06-03 13:46

US, I quite clearly understand the law and I see you missed the portion where I stated if Lovell's and or (your interpretation) is correct, it then makes the finance and admin act a sham. How can any parliament approve the idea of any minister being able to in-debt the country for some 324 million EC without parliament approval? Do you know of any country where Finance manger can in-debt a company, for significant sums, without board approval? The total budget for capital expenditure for 2002 was $206,553,244 EC.I recall the debate from 2002 and what you and Lovell suggest, was never the intention of the 2002 law. If you were to check the prior law (1987), it clearly spelled out what projects the moneys were to be used for. Going with your interpretation reduces us to a situation of no transparency and accountability.

..
0
0
+
−

tenman

Law

#6 Us » 2012-06-03 12:04

Antiguans read what is quoted.....47 says..".no money may be raised on the credit of the government except under the authority of an act of parliament" .....the 2002 act of parliament gives that authority...no wonder Antiguans do not support Tenman and Osbert Freserick as whoever they are they do not understand the law......and it is sad that a member of Parliamemt does not understand his own law passed by his party. Sad.
0
1
+
−

Us

RE: Joseph Accuses Lovell of Deceit

#5 TC » 2012-06-01 23:33

@Pellucid, talk about corruption...ma ybe you need to address all that millions and billions that is being spent in the November Election in the US. You may soon have a government that is being bought or has that happened already. Stanford just continued what he mastered in the US.
1
0
+
−

TC

@Pellucid

#4 It Is Me » 2012-06-01 21:02

@Pellucid ... you have to be one of those gambling Stanford Investors who lost money ... you and the SVC are going about this the wrong way ... instead of going after the individual players who ponzi schemed your greedy behind you decide to attack the whole country ...

Too much dirty money??? Which country is all this "dirty money" coming from?

Diss us all you want just remember we don't start wars amd we don't DROP BOMBS ON INNOCENT CHILDREN!!!
0
0
+
−

It Is Me

fig leaf

#3 tenman » 2012-06-01 09:06

Unfortunately the finance minister and government likes the idea of misinterpreting laws to suit their purpose. Lovell wants us to beleive that via law you make a promise in 2006, and then claim 6 years later that you do not have to adhere to that promise due to a contrary statement (his bad interpretation) made in 2002. The logic that his statement makes the finance and admin act a sham seems hidden from him. Strange thing is, as i recall, MP BS spoke out against the very act, in 2002, that Lovell is now trying to use as a fig leaf, to defend BS's illegal action.

..
5
0
+
−

tenman

De Real Observer

#2 Osbert R. Frederick » 2012-06-01 08:07

I have said over and over again that Spencer, Cort and Lovell shauld have their picture as the dictionary deffinition of the word 'liar'. Lying has become part of Lovell's nature. He lies for no reason at all. For him, lying is innate. How can we have people like that leading our country; people that we simply cannot trust. Antiguans, enough is enougn.
8
1
+
−

Osbert R. Frederick

RE: Joseph Accuses Lovell of Deceit

#1 Pellucid » 2012-06-01 03:29

Lying? Seriously?

Both sides of this so-called government have far more charges to answer to:

$US 7 billion gone in the Stanford/GOAB Ponzi scheme

Half Moon Bay Theft

John Allen Mohammad Passports (Who in Allah's name know where they went???)

All that illegal internet gambling stuff e.g. what happened to the "Bet On Sports" liquidation run by Vantis, the same "liquidators" originally appointed to cover the GOAB from Sir Allen's exploits???

Too much dirty money! and that's before we start with the dock just west of Long Bay Beach!!!!
5
1
+
−

Pellucid

Add comment

World News

Follow us on Facebook

Spotlight on Business

Previous Next
Social Media Exposes Illegal Workers
Antigua St. John's - The saga of illegal workers at Il Giardino, the fine dining...  Read more

Latest Politics News

Search Directory


Directory Listings


Caribbean water treatment Ltd

  Caribbean Water Treatment We specializes in reverse osmosis desalination, water treatment, water pumps and distribution, sewage treatment, ...

Category: Treatment


Mount Joy Service Centre

Mount Joy Service Centre and Convenience Store Conveniently located at the roundabout of Jonas Rd, Pears Village Main Rd and Factory Rd.with a well ...


App

Android LogoDownload Caribarena's Android App Click To Download

Find us on Twitter!