Antigua St John's - A financial adviser testified on Wednesday that R Allen Stanford never told her that he had created the insurance provider he used for his first offshore bank.
Michelle Chambliess, the first witness in the highly anticipated trial, was one of Stanford's first employees in 1987 at Guardian International Investment Securities, a US-based sister company to Stanford's bank in Montserrat that predated his investments in Antigua.
Asked by US attorney William Stellmach whether Stanford had told her the insurance company was just a shell he had set up, Chambliess said no.
He then asked, "Would that have made any difference to you?" and Chambliess replied, "Absolutely. Then there wouldn't be insurance."
Chambliess was only one of several former employees called to testify against Stanford. The Texan, dressed in a suit for court, occasionally shook his head during their testimony.
Chambliess told the court she was fired in 2002, but had already begun looking for another job by then because her boss had told her to "do whatever you need to do" to win clients.
|
|
Download Caribarena's Android App
Click To Download
22 Comments In This Article
RE: Former Employees Testify Against Stanford
Pellucid
Hard Assets? »
Skyewill
Visionfarm@yahoo.com
Camp Zone
RE: Former Employees Testify Against Stanford
Hard Assets?
RE: Former Employees Testify Against Stanford
Pellucid
@ Not his Money
Skyewill
RE: Former Employees Testify Against Stanford
In your list of Stanford assets that were frozen and later returned to investors, you failed to mention that all of Stanford's other assets outside of SFG (including companies and personal effects) have been liquidated or are in the process of being liquidated. The assets that you mention (like gold or T-bills held in trust for his clients) were not his assets to dispose of in the first place, and therefore fell outside the jurisdiction of the receiver.
Antiguan Abroad
@AA
As for the freeze on all SFG (US) accounts when SIB (Antigua) was defaulting on its obligations, as I wrote before, except for Antiguan CDs EVERYTHING HAS BEEN RETURNED TO THE INVESTORS. Every share of stock, every municipal bond, every ounce of gold every cent of cash. Only those who held SIB Antigua CDs have been defrauded, but the SEC locked down everything for a month or so until it was established that only the Antiguan "bank" was a fraud.
Pellucid
RE: Former Employees Testify Against Stanford
Regarding your idea of when the "run" began, I still maintain that it was the actions of the SEC that precipitated a widespread run on Stanford's banks. In fact, Stanford himself has stated as much in a number of his public statements and in his filings with the court.
Antiguan Abroad
Proud ANU Queen and carvaa
Skyewill
Just wondering
Not his Money
Just wondering
Not his Money
not his money
just wondering
@ Carvaa
I couldn't agree with you more. Man's nature is to be disloyal in times of trouble; they tend to turn their back on their friends the minute things go awry. They "wined and dined" with the man, and he hasn't even been found guilty yet, but they're all pointing the finger at him and disassociating themselves. What ever happened to the phrase "A Friend in Need is a Friend Indeed?" I guess in Stanford's case this one is more apropo: "When Days are Dark, Friends are Few."
Proud ANU Queen
RE: Former Employees Testify Against Stanford
One could speculate that since SFG (the broker) only had about 30% of its customers money invested in Antiguan CDs (remember, all of Stanford's other customers got their stocks, bonds, precious metals and cash back after the freeze was lifted) that SFG could have survived we're it not for it's unfortunate name, which is forever associated with SIB Antigua.
Pellucid
RE: Former Employees Testify Against Stanford
Not his Money
RE: Former Employees Testify Against Stanford
Antiguan Abroad
look how people badminded.
lethal.
RE: Former Employees Testify Against Stanford
Memory Loss
Caught
Flunky
stand firm
carvaa
RE: Former Employees Testify Against Stanford
Pellucid
RSS