Antigua St. John's - Dalma Hill, reportedly the new Telecommunications Manager at the Antigua Public Utilities Authority (APUA), has found himself in the middle of an issue related to his current position at the Central Marketing Corporation (CMC).
Sources close to the Corporation have leaked an internal communiqué sent to Hill on February 4, by Chairman of the Board of Directors – Mr. Dave Michael Edwards.
The letter questioned the authority under which Hill – former CMC Managing Director – issued directives to have two containers belonging to CMC (1-40ft and 1 - 20ft), removed and delivered to his personal home.
The containers were taken from the Agricultural Extension yard on or about the week of 21st January 2013.
“…It was reported and confirmed that the removal of the containers was undertaken on your directive, and that one of the containers (20 ft) was delivered to your residence at Campsite (Upper Gambles) and the other, (40 ft was temporary placed on Herbert’s Road, awaiting further instructions from Mr. Frank Morris, Maintenance Manager, CMC,” the letter stated.
Hill was advised that the matter is being treated with considerable seriousness, having been viewed as “extremely distressing and quite unfortunate”.
Furthermore, it was pointed out unequivocally that Hill had failed on several occasions to make the decision known to the Board.
He has been accused with failing to recognize established procedure already in place for the disposal of any part of portion of the Corporation’s assets.
On top of that, Caribarena understands that a directive from the Board of Directors was issued to Hill on January 14, directing that he refrain from any further decision-making or implementation of any changes as he was due to leave the company’s employ effective February 15.
Download Caribarena's Android App
Click To Download
19 Comments In This Article
RE: Dalma Hill Dilemma
Word
RE: Dalma Hill Dilemma
In late 2009 the government gave CMC $1.6 million dollars, yet when Mr Hill joined CMC in 2010, there was an over $1 million dollars over draft, and the Corporation had debts of about $5.5 million dollars.
Dalma Hill is being chastised for two old containers that had rotting roofs and rotting bottoms, but the over $20,000 that is owed to the man is not being addressed by the Corporation. This money was loaned to CMC, but still has not been paid back. When the Chemical Depot needed chemicals, the very same Dalma Hill loaned them over $25,000. Where were the high and mighty board members. Why didn't they step in to loan CMC the money. When CMC was paying ADC workers, paying Willy D for work done on the prison and giving money to government ministers money to go Santo Domingo to fete, where were the said board members. Yet they are the same ones pointing their fingers now.
Mystic One
@ tenman
Morris
Morris - wrong and strong
..
tenman
Unbelievable
Morris
RE: Dalma Hill Dilemma
SHIRWIN
Re: Dalma Hill Dilemma
What about the the person who was hired as a Human Resources consultant and was subsequently made Human Resources Officer?
Is it true that a person who commenced emploment at C M C since 2011, has to date failed to furnish the Board with its request for proof of this person's educational background?
Is it true that the individual who worked as a xxx xxxx Consultant to C M C for approximately one (1) year before been appointed to the position of xxx xxx xxx at C M C, was afforded 14 days vacation leave for the period worked as a Consultant and to date have not produced any report to the Board, with regards to that person's tenure as a xxx xxxx Consultant to C M C, being paid $65.00 per hour?
More to come
The Revelator
"Appropriates"
(1)Any assumption by a person of the rights of an owner amounts to an appropriation, and this includes, where he has come by the property (innocently or not) without stealing it, any later assumption of a right to it by keeping or dealing with it as owner.
(2)Where property or a right or interest in property is or purports to be transferred for value to a person acting in good faith, no later assumption by him of rights which he believed himself to be acquiring shall, by reason of any defect in the transferor’s title, amount to theft of the property.
Lord Have Mercy
"Dishonestly"
(1)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another is not to be regarded as dishonest—
(a)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he has in law the right to deprive the other of it, on behalf of himself or of a third person; or
(b)if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it; or
(c)(except where the property came to him as trustee or personal representative) if he appropriates the property in the belief that the person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.
(2)A person’s appropriation of property belonging to another may be dishonest notwithstanding that he is willing to pay for the property.
Lord Have Mercy
Basic Definition of theft
1 Basic definition of theft.
(1) A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it; and “thief” and “steal” shall be construed accordingly.
(2) It is immaterial whether the appropriation is made with a view to gain, or is made for the thief’s own benefit.
Lord Have Mercy
Dalma Dilemma
Simplicity
RE: Dalma Hill Dilemma
Liberated Employee
@The Fly
Cool Ruler
STOP !!!!!!
skyewill
RE: Dalma Hill Dilemma
NYC
Time Soon Up!
For things to change, the entire Government must go!
Jimmy
RE: Dalma Hill Dilemma
Reality Check
Investigation
The Fly
RE: Dalma Hill Dilemma
The Watcher
RSS