Antigua and Barbuda

Light Rain Shower
77°F
High: 85°F
Low: 79°F
 

Liquidators Battle over Access to Stanford Assets

Liquidators Battle over Access to Stanford AssetsAntigua St. John's - Antigua & Barbuda Joint Liquidators Marcus Wide and Hugh Dickson, representing Grant Thornton, have failed in a bid to get their hands on a portion of the assets belonging to convicted Ponzi-schemer R. Allen Stanford.

According to reports U.S. court-appointed receiver Ralph Janvey may keep control of the process to collect and distribute the Stanford assets, following a court ruling in Dallas Texas on Tuesday.



A Reuters report on Tuesday quotes United States District Judge David Godbey as ruling that it is "manifestly clear" that the US was the "nerve center" of Stanford's estimated $7 billion fraud, which centered on bogus certificates of deposits issued by his Antigua based Stanford International Bank Limited (SIBL).

The judge said that despite the fact that the bank was based in Antigua, most of the day-to-day operations, and most of the victims, were elsewhere.

Spokesperson for the Stanford Victims in Antigua Kate Freeman said this argument about where to locate the center of the SIBL operations has been going on for ages. US authorities have long claimed that the fraud was centered in America, while the Antigua & Barbuda liquidators insist that the heart of the scheme was to be found here.

“The assets in America and those on the island seem like a lot of money but it only comes down to a couple hundred million, and when that gets distributed to all the victims it wont amount to a lot,” Freeman said.

She suggested that most of the money that is going to come back would come through lawsuits, and in this vein liquidators Wide and Dickson have recently filed a lawsuit against Toronto Dominion bank in Canada.

 “They are going after the correspondent banks for Stanford. That's the new route they are going,” Freeman said.

She adds that regardless of what the court rules over the center of Stanford operations, whatever the receiver in America gets will be shared out to all victims.

“It is just that from the victims’ point of view we are going to end up with more if it comes through liquidators here rather than America,” she said.

More than 20,000 investors are estimated to have been bamboozled in the two-decade fraud, which was uncovered in 2009.

"No other country approached the magnitude of the United States as a generator of CD sales … Stanford employees managed and directed the CD enterprise from the United States with no meaningful input from Antigua," Godbey wrote in a 60-page decision.

Godbey implied that the Antigua & Barbuda joint liquidators had engaged in "repeated interference" by challenging the authority of U.S. receiver Ralph Janvey.

Grant Thornton had unsuccessfully sought "non-main" recognition that would allow them to gather evidence and conduct interviews provided they cooperated with Janvey, the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and others.

Elizabeth Ortega, a spokeswoman for the Antigua & Barbuda liquidators, said in a statement that they are likely to appeal.



"We are disappointed that the American court has ruled in a manner inconsistent with the recognition already granted to the joint liquidators in the United Kingdom and Switzerland," she said.

In the meantime, Janvey has reportedly accused the Antigua & Barbuda liquidators of blocking his efforts to recover money from accounts held outside the USA.

Download This Article's Attachments:
Download this file (Amended Motion to Intro Proceedings _final LKD.PDF)Amended Motion to Intro Proceedings _final LKD.PDF342 Kb265 Downloads
Hits: 2447

14 Comments In This Article   

HEADER   

RE: Liquidators Battle over Access to Stanford Assets

#14 Truth » 2012-08-02 03:29

Maybe some good can come of this. Clearly, the investors had little knowledge of what kind of place Antigua is. This is a "Black" country who transshipped arms to the South African Apartheid government when virtually the entire world was observing an embargo. They allowed Gerald Bull to use their coast for a prototype of a ballistic cannon for Saddam Hussein capable of reaching Israel (the Mossad apparently took care of that by slipping a bullet into his cranium). They allowed John Allen Mohammad to sell genuine Antiguan passports to Allah only knows who while he was recruiting and training Lee Malvo for the DC sniper attacks. They were one of the pioneers of illegal internet gambling.

I'm loath to quote ** Cheney, but if no adult supervision is imposed on this rogue state, "the next warning may be a mushroom cloud."
2
1
+
−

Truth

RE: Liquidators Battle over Access to Stanford Assets

#13 Island Bouy » 2012-08-02 03:19

Unmentioned so far is the fact that the GOAB and their "receivers" have been open and clear that any Antiguan claim (even of potential GOAB co-conspiritors ) will be paid 100% before the victims receive a single penny!

The US receivership will pass along 100% after expenses (which unfortunately include legal fees to keep Antiguan hands off what is left from their fraud) whereas if xxxe, xxxxxn and their GOAB employers get access, the cash will disappear as quickly (and probably to the same looter) as the contents of the wine cellar at the Pavillion!
3
1
+
−

Island Bouy

RE: Liquidators Battle over Access to Stanford Assets

#12 Pellucid » 2012-08-02 02:48

Have you forgotten that George W. Bush gave Stanford the highest recommendation in the land?

Actually, in the US, that would be the Congressional Medal of Honor, which Sir Allen didn't get. That would be like getting a Knighthood from a real country (not a British throwaway). What Sir Allen got from Bush was a robo-signed form letter in response to his sponsoring some conference, available to anyone with a few thousand in political contributions.

But since you mentioned political contributions, I'm curious: The US published a list of US contributions, and Janvey is suing to get them back for the investors. Where is Antigua's list of his Knightship's contributions to Antiguan politicians, and when are Wide and **son going to sue their benefactors to retrieve that money for the victims of Antigua's crime?
2
0
+
−

Pellucid

@ Tobi

#11 Good Job Bob » 2012-08-02 00:22

The total amount of Sir Allen's US contributions to US politicians, of both parties, from Memphis dog catcher to US President totalled less than US$ 30 million, less than what he spent in Antigua on a single cricket game.

Exactly how much influence do you think that tiny amount of money buys in a real country??? He could only buy a letter from Bush, not even a "grip & grin" photo like real connected lobbiests who donate hundreds of millions. I'm not saying American politicians can't be bought. They just cost a lot more than an Antiguan scam artist could pay!
4
0
+
−

Good Job Bob

We were ALL taken to the cleaners

#10 Tobi » 2012-08-01 21:52

Goodjobbob, are you aware how many people Stanford bought out (convinced; wined and dined; silenced) from the United States of America in order to succeed at the Ponzi for almost 2 decades? The donations to both political parties in the USA and all the way to the top has already been disclosed in the Press for the past 3 years. Have you forgotten that George W. Bush gave Stanford the highest recommendation in the land? Do some research and weep.
1
5
+
−

Tobi

@Tobi

#9 Good Job Bob » 2012-08-01 16:04

Perhaps you don't understand the difference between passive and active participation. I would be the first to accuse the US of passively letting an Antiguan "Bank", operate an affiliate in the US. They should have demanded real information about the bankrupt health club owner and his government, but after all that fuss they caused over illegal gambling, who wanted to even bother?
5
3
+
−

Good Job Bob

Stanford the

#8 Tobi » 2012-08-01 14:25

It would be wise for GoodJobBob and his ilk to learn that US government people and US regulators were also "active participants". It is instructive to note that these people along with Angela Shaw don't seem to have a peep to say to Chavez about his "active participation". As we say here, "monkey know what tree to climb". Meanwhile, it would be incorrectly presumptive to believe that a US judge has any say on the disposal of assets in Antigua.
4
8
+
−

Tobi

RE: Liquidators Battle over Access to Stanford Assets

#7 Pellucid » 2012-08-01 11:44

While recognizing that the Texas financier's Stanford International Bank Ltd affiliate, which issued the CDs, was in Antigua, the judge said most of the day-to-day operations -- and most of the victims -- were elsewhere.

Just like Vesco, B*u*l*l, JA Mohammad, gun running, Illegal Gambling.... That seems to be Antigua's M.O. !! :-*
8
2
+
−

Pellucid

@Dessalines

#6 GoodJobBob » 2012-08-01 11:36

Of course Godbey had to rule the way he did. What Sir Allen did in Antigua was perfectly legal and had some of Antigua's highest government officials as active participants.

Would you hand control of stolen assets right back to the thieves?
7
3
+
−

GoodJobBob

Dessalines

#5 tenman » 2012-08-01 10:40

Dessalines, your comment expressed my sentiment. Even Bob in his heart knows this is a fact but prefers to ignore it for bitterness sake.

..
6
7
+
−

tenman

@whats up

#4 Get Real » 2012-08-01 10:20

The reason that SIB was rejected for SIPC was that it was an investment that went bad (like Enron). Of course Antigua's case would be strengthened if they were to file charges, publish their FSRC report and honor their extradition treaty. Right now they look like Sir Allen's co-conspiritors .
10
2
+
−

Get Real

hmmmm i thought it was antigua all along

#3 Dessalines » 2012-08-01 10:08

Judge David Godbey as ruling that it is "manifestly clear" that the US was the "nerve center" of Stanford's estimated $7 billion fraud, which centered on bogus certificates of deposits issued by his Antigua based Stanford International Bank Limited (SIBL).

The judge said that despite the fact that the bank was based in Antigua, most of the day-to-day operations, and most of the victims, were elsewhere.

LOL .Where are cellucid and good blow job when you need them?????
7
7
+
−

Dessalines

So the US is responsible

#2 whats UP » 2012-08-01 09:02

So, if the court in the US says that most of the fraud took place in the US, is this not an admission of liability and therefor the funds should be FDIC insured and the SEC should be responsible for the remaining funds as they admitted that they new for years that this was going on. Make up you mind uncle SAM, you can't have your cake and eat it. Give us our money, not to the receivers. You are a bunch of thieves.
7
5
+
−

whats UP

RE: Liquidators Battle over Access to Stanford Assets

#1 hmmmmm » 2012-08-01 06:28

Why these 3 are not in jail along with Stanford? How much have they collected? How much have they ben paid? And how much have the depositors received? And they say Stanford is a criminal? I think these 3 should be sharing a cell with him.
5
4
+
−

hmmmmm

Add comment

World News

Follow us on Facebook

Spotlight on Business

Previous Next
Il Giardino Closed for Now
Antigua St. John's - Local staff members of the embattled Italian Restaurant IL...  Read more

Latest News

Search Directory


Directory Listings


Leeward Islands Hurricane Protection

Leeward Islands Hurricane Protection has been providing security and hurricane protection products throughout the Caribbean since the late 1980’s. ...



Peaceful Moments

Peaceful Momentsoffers everything from Children books, picture frames, plaques, religious relics, catholic decors, Christian music and other ...

Category: Gifts

App

Android LogoDownload Caribarena's Android App Click To Download

Find us on Twitter!