- Details
-
Latest
-
Thursday, 12 July 2012 02:31
-
By caribarena news
Antigua St. John's - Cool and Smooth has been fined EC$106,144.20 for its role in the illegal removal of one of its containers from the port on May 25.
The broker involved in the transaction has also been fined EC$109,335.72.
Meanwhile, the customs officer involved in the illegal movement remains on suspension.
According to reports from the Customs and Excise Division, Customs Officer Garfield Morris and Foston George of the brokerage firm F&G Trading Customs have both pleaded guilty in the investigation that lasted just over a month. The guilty pleas have marked the conclusion of the inquiry.
“Collection of EC$215,479.92 in fines in a single case of this nature is the largest ever collected by Customs in recent history,” Customs said.
Reports from the Comptroller’s office on Wednesday also revealed that the importer, M/S Cool & Smooth represented by Mr. Amir Hourani, accepted the responsibility of sharing the blame for the wrongdoing, even though Hourani was not directly involved in the unlawful removal of the container. This acceptance of responsibility resulted in the hefty fine.
Cool and Smooth was charged for untrue declaration; unlawful removal of the container; and unpaid duties and taxes.
Customs said too that F&G Trading Customs confessed to the fraud and was fined EC$109,335.72 for untrue declaration; unlawful removal of the container; and bribery and collusion.
The Finance Ministry has been made aware of the situation and efforts have been taken to keep Customs Officer Morris on suspension. Morris was suspended about a week after the incident occurred.
“It is not within the powers of the Comptroller to take any action other than reporting the findings of the investigation pertaining to that officer. It is our understanding that the Establishment Division will take further appropriate action on the matter,” the statement said.
Comptroller Raju Boddu gave assurances that the investigation was “kept transparent and conducted in a mutually respectful environment, mindful of each others’ rights and obligations.” He said the weight of the fines should serve as a deterrent for future illegal activities from customs officers, brokers and importers alike.
“The Customs Department would like to bring a closure to the case and wishes to send out a strong signal to the general public and to clients alike that it is not “business as usual” at Customs, and irregularities of any kind from anybody will be dealt with seriously.
We are determined to reform only to serve you all better,” Boddu stated.
See related stories:
Customs Officer Suspended in Alleged Fraud Investigation
Cool and Smooth Speaks Out
Alleged Fraud at Customs
19 Comments In This Article
RE: Hefty Fines For Illegal Container Removal
What is this "country" coming to?
Reality
Take Warning (A second attempt)
Daughter of Klaas
Investigate WPP
Concerned
RE: Hefty Fines For Illegal Container Removal
Morris
RE: Hefty Fines For Illegal Container Removal
GLEN
Justice but
dadlison
@ Cool And Smooth
Anu
RE: Hefty Fines For Illegal Container Removal
from the east
RE: Hefty Fines For Illegal Container Removal
Informer
RE: Hefty Fines For Illegal Container Removal
Fed Up
RE: Hefty Fines For Illegal Container Removal
Egg Shells
BILLION $ QUESTION IS?
OO7
Public Servant of the Year 2012. Mr. Raju Boddu
Also, since you have opened a door to honesty and transparency, maybe you can also be appointed to investigate that xxx business xxx for the work on the sidewalks in St. John's, as well as the multi-million dollar trash bin in Johnson's, among other questionable fraud laiden contracts with Public Works. May God continue to guide you in all that you do to help clean this country.
The Messenger
RE: Hefty Fines For Illegal Container Removal
budman
COMPOUNDING OFFENCES WITH PENALITIES
The Section states "...The Comptroller of Customns, may as he 'THINKS FIT" may compound (a) ANY OFFENCE."
This process involves no "...TRIAL" before a Magistrate. It is "...negotiable" and is simply where the Comptroller may decide not to proceed with "...Criminal proceedings" against an offender. Thus, factors considered are usually making **sments on goods-(subject of the offence); payable Tariffs and the imposition of a "...PENALTY."
Offenders with the financial ability usually "...OPT" for this process, if only to avoid societal embar**ment and/or and the humiliation of a public criminal trial. To Customs authorities, it is better and much easier to recoup the Tariffs and Penalities over a lengthy trial and the uncertainty of a conviction.
RAWLSTON POMPEY
Convenient
james c
Good job Comptroller
Skyewill
cold cases
Jumbee Picknee
Do's and do not's !
Coopin
RSS