- Details
-
Latest
-
Thursday, 14 June 2012 14:37
-
By caribarena news
Antigua St John’s - Former Antigua-based jet-setting Texas tycoon R. Allen Stanford, whose financial empire once spanned the Americas, was sentenced Thursday to 110 years in prison for bilking investors out of more than $7 billion over 20 years in one of the largest Ponzi schemes in U.S. history.
U.S. District Judge David Hittner handed down the sentence during a court hearing in which two people spoke on behalf of Stanford's investors about how his fraud had affected their lives.
Prosecutors had asked that Stanford be sentenced to 230 years in prison, the maximum sentence possible after a jury convicted the one-time billionaire in March on 13 of 14 fraud related counts. Stanford's convictions on conspiracy, wire and mail fraud charges followed a seven-week trial.
Stanford's attorneys had asked for a maximum of 44 months, a sentence he could have completed within about eight months because he has been jailed since his arrest in June 2009.
During Thursday's sentencing hearing, Stanford gave rambling statement to the court in which he denied he did anything wrong. Speaking for more than 40 minutes, Stanford said he was a scapegoat and blamed the federal government and a U.S. appointed receiver who took over his companies for tearing down his business empire and preventing his investors from getting any of their money back.
"I'm not here to ask for sympathy or forgiveness or to throw myself at your mercy," Stanford told Hittner. "I did not run a Ponzi scheme. I didn't defraud anybody."
Stanford was once considered one of the richest men in the U.S., with an estimated net worth of more than $2 billion. His financial empire stretched from the U.S. to Latin America and the Caribbean. But after his arrest, all of his assets were seized and he had to rely on court-appointed attorneys to defend him.
Calling Stanford arrogant and remorseless, prosecutors said he used the money from investors who bought certificates of deposit, or CDs, from his Stanford International Bank Ltd on the Caribbean island nation of Antigua & Barbuda to fund a string of failed businesses, bribe regulators and pay for a lavish lifestyle that included yachts, a fleet of private jets and sponsorship of cricket tournaments.
Defense attorneys portrayed Stanford, 62, as a visionary entrepreneur who made money for investors and conducted legitimate business deals. They accused the prosecution's star witness - James M. Davis, the former chief financial officer for Stanford's various companies of being behind the fraud and tried to discredit him by calling him a liar and tax cheat.
The jury that convicted Stanford also cleared the way for U.S. authorities to go after about $330 million in stolen investor funds sitting in the financier's frozen foreign bank accounts in Canada, England and Switzerland.
But due to legal wrangling, it could be years before the more than 21,000 investors recover anything, and whatever they ultimately get will only be a fraction of what they lost.
The financier's trial was delayed after he was declared incompetent in January 2011 due to an anti-anxiety drug addiction he developed in jail. He underwent treatment and was declared fit for trial in December.
Three other former Stanford executives are scheduled for trial in September.
A former Antiguan financial regulator was indicted and awaits extradition to the U.S.
Stanford and his former executives also are fighting a lawsuit from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that accuses them of fraud.
26 Comments In This Article
RE: Stanford Jailed for 110 Years
Pellucid
RE: Stanford Jailed for 110 Years
Did these "investors" think that a small island rejected by the UK was a "country" with the resources and incentive to guarantee investments like real countries? Did they not read "Caribbean Time Bomb", or research Antigua's history from Vesco to B*u*l*l to John Allen Mohammad/Lee Malvo???
I guess Sir Allen lived by the old expression: "A fool and his money are one hell of a party!"
outsidelookingin
@tenman
GoodJobBob
RE: Stanford Jailed for 110 Years
Fed Up
RE: Stanford Jailed for 110 Years
Don't worry about the sentence handed down by this earthly judge. There is a bigger judge that we all have to answer to. Focus on where you stand before Him. This is what ultimately counts when all is said and done.
"And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment" ~Hebrews 9:27
For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that EVERY ONE may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad. 2 Corin 5:10
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that WHOSOEV ER believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
Smoke n Mirrors
@Hmmmmm
It was not an accident that this Texan financier ended up putting his bank in Antigua. And it was unfortunate that some Americans got suckered by Stanford into buying his fraudulent and offshore CDs.
Reality
@ Vicnes
R. Berry
@tenman
At present the estimated net loss to Madoff investors is 40-50% of 17 billion, but as I pointed out, the Madoff liquidator has control of the firm's records and the cooperation of the government, so further recoveries are possible, in my estimation likely. The Stanford liquidators have recovered next to nothing out of 7 billion, and with CAS Hewlett's hard drives as empty as the wine cellar in the Pavillion, I doubt they have any leads to follow. I wouldn't expect any cooperation from the minister of justice, that's for sure!
GoodJobBob
True
skyewill
good job Bob - get the facts stright
Quote:GoodJobBob, you stated total. The NY Times article states recovery will be no more than 8.3 billion. The NY times article says 17.6 regarding moneys actually invested after excluding fake profits. Picard had law suits trying to get 100 billion and the stated investor claims was 65 billion. Even if the receivers in Antigua got 0% recovery, it will still mean the total amount lost in Antigua could not be more than 7 billion (this figure probably includes fake profits). The NY Times article shows total loses (excluding fake profits) for the Madoff scheme will be at least 8.65 billion. The claimed amount for Madoff was (65 billion) which makes the losses for Madoff based on claims around 57 billion. We are yet to know the clean total amount of moneys invested with Stanford.
..
tenman
RE: Stanford Jailed for 110 Years
http://www.forbes.com/sites/joanlappin/2011/12/27/trustee-for-the-madoff-estate-has-recovered-60-of-the-victims-money-for-big-fees/
But either way, that's far more than anyone will be able to salvage from Antigua's pile of Knightsoil!
GoodJobBob
MORRIS
It is very easy for the US to get Leroy King. They only need to deny entry VISA to Spencer and his entire cabinet, the other members of Parliament, and all of the leading local business people. Once this is done, the very next day King will be on a plane to New York.
R. Berry, comparing the Redjet bankruptcy to the Stanford ponzi scheme is like comparing apples to billy goats. Redjet did not defraud its creditors. They simply ran out of cash. The same thing happened to General Motors and Obama bailed them out using the US tax payers money.
Vicnes
RE: Stanford Jailed for 110 Years
Morris
Good job Bob
Quote:..
tenman
Good job Bob
Quote:..
tenman
sing Allen sing...
Jumbee Picknee
Hmmmm
..
tenman
Nothing Learned
marco polo
RE: Stanford Jailed for 110 Years
Redjet declares bankruptcy and likely leave their creditors in a big hole..and again no one from Redjet gets locked up.
So is there legal and illegal crimes, or different laws for different folks? Or does it depend on if you "rob" government or the public at large?
R. Berry
RE: Stanford Jailed for 110 Years
Daughter of the Soil
RE: Stanford Jailed for 110 Years
Second, when all is said and done, Sir Allen's fraud may exceed Madoff's both in % lost and total. Irving Picard has been able to successfully peruse recovery, lawsuits and claw-backs because all the records are available, and the US government is co-operating. In Sir Allen's case, the Antiguan government (which chartered and regulated SIB) has charged no one, suppressed their own report, reneged on their extradition treaty and have not allowed any independent investigation of records at the bank. In addition to this obstruction of justice, they have allegedly begun to expropriate what assets remain in Antigua. They have also appointed their own "liquidators" (strange, since Sir Allen faces no charges in Antigua) to frustrate US efforts at recovery.
The Madoff investors will certainly receive a higher percentage of recovery than Sir Allen's, and despite Madoff's fraud initially being 5+ times larger, Sir Allen's investor's total losses could easily be greater.
GoodJobBob
RE: Stanford Jailed for 110 Years
Johnny
110 years to think about it!
Dig It
Copied from NY Times
Hmmmm
RE: Stanford Jailed for 110 Years
yaya
RE: Stanford Jailed for 110 Years
yaya
RSS