Antigua and Barbuda

Partly Cloudy
79°F
High: 84°F
Low: 77°F
 

Stanford Jailed for 110 Years

Stanford Jailed for 110 YearsAntigua St John’s - Former Antigua-based jet-setting Texas tycoon R. Allen Stanford, whose financial empire once spanned the Americas, was sentenced Thursday to 110 years in prison for bilking investors out of more than $7 billion over 20 years in one of the largest Ponzi schemes in U.S. history.

U.S. District Judge David Hittner handed down the sentence during a court hearing in which two people spoke on behalf of Stanford's investors about how his fraud had affected their lives.

Prosecutors had asked that Stanford be sentenced to 230 years in prison, the maximum sentence possible after a jury convicted the one-time billionaire in March on 13 of 14 fraud related counts. Stanford's convictions on conspiracy, wire and mail fraud charges followed a seven-week trial.

Stanford's attorneys had asked for a maximum of 44 months, a sentence he could have completed within about eight months because he has been jailed since his arrest in June 2009.

During Thursday's sentencing hearing, Stanford gave rambling statement to the court in which he denied he did anything wrong. Speaking for more than 40 minutes, Stanford said he was a scapegoat and blamed the federal government and a U.S. appointed receiver who took over his companies for tearing down his business empire and preventing his investors from getting any of their money back.

"I'm not here to ask for sympathy or forgiveness or to throw myself at your mercy," Stanford told Hittner. "I did not run a Ponzi scheme. I didn't defraud anybody."



Stanford was once considered one of the richest men in the U.S., with an estimated net worth of more than $2 billion. His financial empire stretched from the U.S. to Latin America and the Caribbean. But after his arrest, all of his assets were seized and he had to rely on court-appointed attorneys to defend him.

Calling Stanford arrogant and remorseless, prosecutors said he used the money from investors who bought certificates of deposit, or CDs, from his Stanford International Bank Ltd on the Caribbean island nation of Antigua & Barbuda to fund a string of failed businesses, bribe regulators and pay for a lavish lifestyle that included yachts, a fleet of private jets and sponsorship of cricket tournaments.

Defense attorneys portrayed Stanford, 62, as a visionary entrepreneur who made money for investors and conducted legitimate business deals. They accused the prosecution's star witness - James M. Davis, the former chief financial officer for Stanford's various companies of being behind the fraud and tried to discredit him by calling him a liar and tax cheat.

The jury that convicted Stanford also cleared the way for U.S. authorities to go after about $330 million in stolen investor funds sitting in the financier's frozen foreign bank accounts in Canada, England and Switzerland.

But due to legal wrangling, it could be years before the more than 21,000 investors recover anything, and whatever they ultimately get will only be a fraction of what they lost.

The financier's trial was delayed after he was declared incompetent in January 2011 due to an anti-anxiety drug addiction he developed in jail. He underwent treatment and was declared fit for trial in December.

Three other former Stanford executives are scheduled for trial in September.

A former Antiguan financial regulator was indicted and awaits extradition to the U.S.

Stanford and his former executives also are fighting a lawsuit from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that accuses them of fraud.

Hits: 2711

26 Comments In This Article   

HEADER   

RE: Stanford Jailed for 110 Years

#26 Pellucid » 2012-06-17 02:59

Now that the Knight Sir Allen has gotten 110, we only have to wonder how much Bird, Spencer, Cort and King will get.
3
1
+
−

Pellucid

RE: Stanford Jailed for 110 Years

#25 outsidelookingin » 2012-06-16 21:06

You have to wonder who would invest in a bank claiming assets which are a large multiple of the country regulating it.

Did these "investors" think that a small island rejected by the UK was a "country" with the resources and incentive to guarantee investments like real countries? Did they not read "Caribbean Time Bomb", or research Antigua's history from Vesco to B*u*l*l to John Allen Mohammad/Lee Malvo???

I guess Sir Allen lived by the old expression: "A fool and his money are one hell of a party!"
3
0
+
−

outsidelookingin

@tenman

#24 GoodJobBob » 2012-06-16 00:51

Also not included in recovery by the receivers/liqui dators is the SIPC coverage of US$500,000 per account which is not available to investors in Antiguan banks.
1
0
+
−

GoodJobBob

RE: Stanford Jailed for 110 Years

#23 Fed Up » 2012-06-15 11:12

When Stanford's empire collapsed there were reports that he was trying to get back to Antigua. I wonder what would have happened if he had succeeded, would he be dodging the US Courts like Leroy is, using every trick in the book to evade justice. Would he be using his political buddies to exert their judicial influence to keep him here, jus wonderin .
3
2
+
−

Fed Up

RE: Stanford Jailed for 110 Years

#22 Smoke n Mirrors » 2012-06-15 10:35

Dear Mr. Stanford:
Don't worry about the sentence handed down by this earthly judge. There is a bigger judge that we all have to answer to. Focus on where you stand before Him. This is what ultimately counts when all is said and done.

"And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment" ~Hebrews 9:27

For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that EVERY ONE may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad. 2 Corin 5:10

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that WHOSOEV ER believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
8
4
+
−

Smoke n Mirrors

@Hmmmmm

#21 Reality » 2012-06-15 09:45

From Forbes:

It was not an accident that this Texan financier ended up putting his bank in Antigua. And it was unfortunate that some Americans got suckered by Stanford into buying his fraudulent and offshore CDs.
7
0
+
−

Reality

@ Vicnes

#20 R. Berry » 2012-06-15 07:02

When you open a company that even the world's most dumbest person knows it has no medium or long term sustainability. ...go out and get people to give you credit and then a few months later declare bankruptcy...th ere has to some deceit and defraud in there.
4
2
+
−

R. Berry

@tenman

#19 GoodJobBob » 2012-06-15 01:56

Note the word after the highlight "could". I used that word specifically, since it implies both uncertainty, and the future. If I meant to be definate and in the present, I would use a word like did or has.

At present the estimated net loss to Madoff investors is 40-50% of 17 billion, but as I pointed out, the Madoff liquidator has control of the firm's records and the cooperation of the government, so further recoveries are possible, in my estimation likely. The Stanford liquidators have recovered next to nothing out of 7 billion, and with CAS Hewlett's hard drives as empty as the wine cellar in the Pavillion, I doubt they have any leads to follow. I wouldn't expect any cooperation from the minister of justice, that's for sure! :D
8
3
+
−

GoodJobBob

True

#18 skyewill » 2012-06-15 00:28

Stanford said he was a scapegoat and blamed the federal government and a U.S. appointed receiver who took over his companies for tearing down his business empire and preventing his investors from getting any of their money back.
5
9
+
−

skyewill

good job Bob - get the facts stright

#17 tenman » 2012-06-14 22:11

GoodJobBob you stated:
Quote:
.. and despite Madoff's fraud initially being 5+ times larger, Sir Allen's investor's total losses could easily be greater
GoodJobBob, you stated total. The NY Times article states recovery will be no more than 8.3 billion. The NY times article says 17.6 regarding moneys actually invested after excluding fake profits. Picard had law suits trying to get 100 billion and the stated investor claims was 65 billion. Even if the receivers in Antigua got 0% recovery, it will still mean the total amount lost in Antigua could not be more than 7 billion (this figure probably includes fake profits). The NY Times article shows total loses (excluding fake profits) for the Madoff scheme will be at least 8.65 billion. The claimed amount for Madoff was (65 billion) which makes the losses for Madoff based on claims around 57 billion. We are yet to know the clean total amount of moneys invested with Stanford.

..
3
6
+
−

tenman

RE: Stanford Jailed for 110 Years

#16 GoodJobBob » 2012-06-14 20:45

Tenman, thanks for making my point. The Times says half, Forbes says 60%,

http://www.forbes.com/sites/joanlappin/2011/12/27/trustee-for-the-madoff-estate-has-recovered-60-of-the-victims-money-for-big-fees/

But either way, that's far more than anyone will be able to salvage from Antigua's pile of Knightsoil!
10
5
+
−

GoodJobBob

MORRIS

#15 Vicnes » 2012-06-14 20:45

Morris, the justice department never brought any charges against Errol Cort.

It is very easy for the US to get Leroy King. They only need to deny entry VISA to Spencer and his entire cabinet, the other members of Parliament, and all of the leading local business people. Once this is done, the very next day King will be on a plane to New York.

R. Berry, comparing the Redjet bankruptcy to the Stanford ponzi scheme is like comparing apples to billy goats. Redjet did not defraud its creditors. They simply ran out of cash. The same thing happened to General Motors and Obama bailed them out using the US tax payers money.
11
1
+
−

Vicnes

RE: Stanford Jailed for 110 Years

#14 Morris » 2012-06-14 18:24

The gov't should go ahead and turn over Leroy King and Errol Cort to the US authorities so that this entire saga can be put to rest.
22
3
+
−

Morris

Good job Bob

#13 tenman » 2012-06-14 18:13

Bob another interesting part of the article is:
Quote:
According to a Government Accountability Office report quoting the Securities Investor Protection Corporation, which hired Mr. Picard as the bankruptcy trustee, it is unlikely he will be able to pay back Mr. Madoff’s customers the $17.3 billion that he had said was his goal, let alone the $100 billion he originally sought. Indeed, at the rate he’s going, he would be lucky to return more than half of the $17.3 billion.
..
7
7
+
−

tenman

Good job Bob

#12 tenman » 2012-06-14 18:09

Good job Bob as usual you persist in providing incorrect info. A NY Times article, by ANDREW ROSS SORKIN, from may 28 says of Piccard:

Quote:
Irving H. Picard, the court-appointed trustee seeking to recover funds for the victims of Bernard L. Madoff’s multibillion-dollar Ponzi scheme, has been described as a modern-day Robin Hood. For nearly four years, he has been working to pay back those who were swindled by Mr. Madoff, some who lost their entire life savings. Yet a look at recent court filings shows Mr. Picard has had much more success collecting money for himself and a dozen law firms and consultants than any victim of Mr. Madoff’s crime. So far, Mr. Picard’s efforts have created a whopping $554 million in legal and other fees. How much have Mr. Madoff’s victims actually received from all of the cases and motions he’s made? Only $330 million. And how much does Mr. Picard estimate the fee spigot will pour out by 2014? A mere $1 billion.
..
7
8
+
−

tenman

sing Allen sing...

#11 Jumbee Picknee » 2012-06-14 18:07

Our Nation is Antigua, Barbuda &Redonda. Why ate we giving away Redonda for naught? It gives us our Nautical Miles for fushing, and for future development. ...butsing Allen sing, sing til your throat get dry, sing til your eyes cant cry, just sing like the fat lady, and hopefully all those damn **ed politicians with join you behind bars, and send a message to the others who thrive off schemes like yours.
9
1
+
−

Jumbee Picknee

Hmmmm

#10 tenman » 2012-06-14 18:02

Yaya wel said. hmm you think that last line only referred to Antiguan politicians? Its public knowledge that he made political contributions to politicians here and abroad. Hopefully the receivers will be able to get the investors back something which will ensure this experience is not a total lost for them. I also hope my government will engage those investors willing to listen, and show them some respect.
..
7
6
+
−

tenman

Nothing Learned

#9 marco polo » 2012-06-14 17:39

Who among you doubts that the next sugar daddy who shows up (there will be others although not on Sir AS's scale) will be welcomed with open arms? Unfortunately, no lessons will be learned.
9
2
+
−

marco polo

RE: Stanford Jailed for 110 Years

#8 R. Berry » 2012-06-14 17:37

It's amusing how our western laws can lock up the likes of Stanford and Madoff, but the big boys at Clico and British American still living high on the hog and thousands have lost thousands, even millions.

Redjet declares bankruptcy and likely leave their creditors in a big hole..and again no one from Redjet gets locked up.

So is there legal and illegal crimes, or different laws for different folks? Or does it depend on if you "rob" government or the public at large?
11
3
+
−

R. Berry

RE: Stanford Jailed for 110 Years

#7 Daughter of the Soil » 2012-06-14 16:52

My question is: what is being done by the ANU government to ensure that this sorry story and the stain on the reputation of Antigua and Barbuda, does not happen again? We need to learn valuable lesson!!!
9
1
+
−

Daughter of the Soil

RE: Stanford Jailed for 110 Years

#6 GoodJobBob » 2012-06-14 16:02

It seems unjust that Sir Allen got less time than Madoff. First, Madoff plead guilty, cooperated with the receivership, and actually showd remorse for his crimes. Sir Allen has done none of that.

Second, when all is said and done, Sir Allen's fraud may exceed Madoff's both in % lost and total. Irving Picard has been able to successfully peruse recovery, lawsuits and claw-backs because all the records are available, and the US government is co-operating. In Sir Allen's case, the Antiguan government (which chartered and regulated SIB) has charged no one, suppressed their own report, reneged on their extradition treaty and have not allowed any independent investigation of records at the bank. In addition to this obstruction of justice, they have allegedly begun to expropriate what assets remain in Antigua. They have also appointed their own "liquidators" (strange, since Sir Allen faces no charges in Antigua) to frustrate US efforts at recovery.

The Madoff investors will certainly receive a higher percentage of recovery than Sir Allen's, and despite Madoff's fraud initially being 5+ times larger, Sir Allen's investor's total losses could easily be greater.
11
8
+
−

GoodJobBob

RE: Stanford Jailed for 110 Years

#5 Johnny » 2012-06-14 16:00

Glad to see an end to this 3+ year saga. Its time for Mr King now to face the music...
12
2
+
−

Johnny

110 years to think about it!

#4 Dig It » 2012-06-14 15:58

Guess, Leroy must be really "scared" wherever he is! I hear you can't drop the sxxx in US prisons!
13
3
+
−

Dig It

Copied from NY Times

#3 Hmmmm » 2012-06-14 15:49

Antigua People we need to watch out..... this was quoted from the NY times ......."For Mr. Stanford, the verdict and sentencing represented the end of a remarkable career that began with a Texas fitness club venture. After it went bankrupt, he tried offshore banking and lived a life of glamour. Mr. Stanford is now a shadow of the swaggering financier who only three years ago had an estimated fortune of over $2 billion, a knighthood awarded by Antigua and a collection of yachts and a fleet of jets. He even owned his own professional cricket team and stadium on Antigua, which according to prosecutors he treated like his personal business haven in the West Indies, with politicians in tow, through bribes and political campaign contributions. "
12
1
+
−

Hmmmm

RE: Stanford Jailed for 110 Years

#2 yaya » 2012-06-14 15:39

To avoid another Ponzi scheme.
13
1
+
−

yaya

RE: Stanford Jailed for 110 Years

#1 yaya » 2012-06-14 15:38

Stanford got what he deserved. I am sorry for the investors from America, Latin America and Antigua & Barbuda, and also the employees who lost everything. Antigua & Barbuda welcomes any stranger who arrives in the country with big business plans. These people should be questioned and criminal background checks should be performed before we allow these people to begin any type of "business" in the country. We should contact their State or country of origin and get a history of their activity. I understand there is a man from the Bahamas who is planning a tire recycling business with the government. Someone should investigate and do some research on him. Please do a criminal check on that person.
18
1
+
−

yaya

Add comment

World News

Follow us on Facebook

Spotlight on Business

Previous Next
Social Media Exposes Illegal Workers
Antigua St. John's - The saga of illegal workers at Il Giardino, the fine dining...  Read more

Latest News

Search Directory


Directory Listings


Ideas Inc

Ideas Inc is a result driven Antiguan Business Development Company offering marketing/branding, PR, event planning and training consultancy to the ...

Category: Consultants


Mings Lumber & Hardware

We make your plans a reality. Our friendly staff are happy to see you. Our hours are: Weekdays from 7:00 am to 5:00 pm Sundays from 7:00 am to 2:00 ...


App

Android LogoDownload Caribarena's Android App Click To Download

Find us on Twitter!