Senator Massiah Attends IWC Meeting

Details

Environment Articles

Wednesday, 04 July 2012 02:30

By press release

Antigua St. John’s – Serving in the capacity of Alternate Commissioner, Senator Joanne Massiah is Antigua & Barbuda’s representative to the 64th Annual Meeting of the International Whaling Commission (IWC).

Whale Sanctuaries, the IWC in the Future, and Whale Stocks were some of the topics that came up for discussion, yesterday, during the Plenary Session of the July 3rd to 6th meeting in Panama City, Panama.

“The Sanctuary issue is highly contentious and is of concern to the countries which subscribe to the principle of the sustainable use of living marine resources - including the OECS states which all oppose the proposal. Importantly, the refusal of the proponents of what is, in essence, a scheduled amendment to the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW) to engage in meaningful dialogue with countries which oppose their proposals has further fuelled the debate,” a press statement elaborated.

“Repeatedly tabled for consideration since 1998, the proposal essentially seeks to create a Sanctuary for Whales in the South Atlantic Ocean – an area which encompasses vast maritime space is co-sponsored by Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay and supported by all the anti-sustainable use countries. The proponents claim that their primary objective is to promote bio-diversity, conservation, the non-lethal use of whales and stimulate the coordinated research activities of developing coastal nations.”   



However, the objection to the proposal by the pro-sustainable use countries is based on the fact that the Scientific Committee of the IWC has repeatedly stated that there is no ecological justifiable reason for the establishment of such sanctuaries.

This finding was re-enforced in 2004 by a panel of external scientists who, on reviewing a similar proposal for the establishment of the Southern Ocean sanctuary, stated emphatically that the justification proffered by the proponents are inter alia, “based on vague goals and objectives, lack rigorous approach to its design” and have no basis in science… Sadly, the proponents have blatantly refused to accept the findings of the Commission’s own scientists on this issue.



Antigua & Barbuda reiterated its position that, presently, no whaling of any kind takes place within the proposed boundaries; that the 1982 moratorium on whaling remains in effect; and that there are other far reaching adverse effects which the proposal would have on the developmental aspirations of developing coastal nations such as, maritime traffic and renewable energy explorations currently ongoing within the southern Caribbean.

Of equal concern is the fact that the proposal is not in keeping with Article V (2) (b) of the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW) which states that amendments of the [Convention’s] schedule “shall be based on scientific findings” – an essential precondition which the proposal lacks.

After robust debate on the issue, the proposers requested that the proposal be put to a vote notwithstanding requests from the pro-sustainable use nations that both sides seek to negotiate the issue further in an effort to reach consensus on the matter.

The vote failed to achieve the three-fourths majority required to effect a scheduled amendment and the proposal therefore was rejected.

The proponents have vowed to continue bringing the proposal before future IWC meetings.
 

• < Prev
• Next >